Woodwind.OrgThe Clarinet BBoardThe C4 standard

 
  BBoard Equipment Study Resources Music General    
 
 New Topic  |  Go to Top  |  Go to Topic  |  Search  |  Help/Rules  |  Smileys/Notes  |  Log In   Newer Topic  |  Older Topic 
 Some things I think makes a "pro" performer or group
Author: sfalexi 
Date:   2013-02-18 14:41

Disclaimer - It's a little disjointed, as are most of my thoughts, but this is mainly from a spectator standpoint. What would I want in a guest artist or when I attend a performance.

Just been thinking about stuff. And I realize there are many musicians out there that are really truly great. I mean, there are clarinetists left and right who have technique out the wazoo.

But after some thinking and seeing/hearing what I consider to be some truly great musicians play over the recent past weeks, I've come up with a short list of things that I believe would help to get the gigs. Pros, I'm curious if you think these are important too.

1) Adaptability - Not necessarily just to musical styles, but to personalities. I feel that getting the gigs requires you to almost be a bit of a "clarinet chameleon". No one is going to hire someone whose personality doesn't mesh well with the group. Maybe you can play the crap out of that classical excerpt, but there are probably at least a few others that can be hired that can play the same stuff. But if they dislike you and you bring a negative vibe to the group, hell, I wouldn't want you around. As far as musical styles go, I think it goes without saying that the more capabilities you have the more likely you are to be hired. You don't necessarily want to be known as the "mozart" guy, cause you'd be jobless during Brahms month.

Accompanying Story - This weekend I went out and watched a young new sax players (22 years old, straight out college) sit in on a few tunes at a local jazz club. This dude is one AMAZING jazzer. All tunes straight out of his head, and he can has amazing ideas and connects them so smoothly. Easily CD/Radio worthy. But he looked awkward. Sounded great, looked awkward. He wasn't used to playing with this group and so was trying to use conventional hand signals (circle the finger for "take another ride", pat the head for "back to the top", stuff like that). The group could've 'felt' it out with more subtle signals, but he just needs to learn to "gel" and feel the group out better. He'll get there quickly, but I could tell the group kinda looked surprised and might've had a, "You don't need to tell us to go back to the top, we've been doing this for more years than you've been alive" feel. They kinda smiled at his signals, accommodating them. But he'll learn to be more adaptable, and he'll be called in more often.

2) Getting parts down quickly - The less time it takes to get a piece down, the more marketable. Studio time costs money, last minute substitutions and sicknesses happen. If you can be "that guy" that can get the music a week before and pull off a good performance, that saves YOU the time needed to rehearse, and gets you that callback. It'd be nice to always have months to prepare for a recital, but getting started, until you can fill an auditorium months out with your name, it's about getting it down quickly and cleanly and working your way up the chain getting your name out there.

Accompanying Story - A community band I'm in played with a professional clarinetist a few weeks ago (3rd movement to one of the Weber Concertos). The first rehearsal with us he played and it was obvious he was just reading right off the page, with the exception of the very technical spots which were obvious he had rehearsed them. The second run through two weeks later was damned near perfect, and the concert went amazing. And I got to thinking, "That's why he's a pro. He knows how to prioritize and get it down quick." Obviously, running through excerpts and repertoire like this is not so you can have it all memorized all the time, but so you can get get ideas and patterns in your fingers so you can call them up at a later time. And it was obvious that he planned out his practicing to get the hard parts down solid, quickly. The parts he could read through, he read through the first two rehearsals and just planned it down to get it flawless by concert time. That kind of planning and ability to get it down quickly is one reason he's a pro. Not to mention, who knows what else he has on his plate.

Reminds me of what I've heard very often. Don't rehearse the easy parts, rehearse what you CAN'T get.

side note - this professional clarinetist was very personable and courteous to our community band and our director. I'm sure it's his personality as a whole, but I'd have a hard time believing that a stuckup "know it all" clarinetist would be invited for repeat performances without at least being professional.

3) PR. Public Relations. Smile, show happiness with your job and performance level. Shake hands and kiss babies. Well, maybe not necessary to go that far, but remember a live performance is just that - a performance. Sounding good is all well, but looking like you're having fun, engaging the audience, sticking around afterwards, having business cards and networking are important. You sound great in a practice room, well, time to show the world. I've watched groups play and if I close my eyes I love what I hear. And when I open them I get bored out of my skull. Why pay for a show or performance when I can hear it on a CD? I don't need fireworks and T-shirts shot at me, but I've heard plenty of times about energetic conductors getting the audience fired up, and go ahead and dress nice. Sad to say, but despite whatever you're playing, people listen with their eyes as well as their ears. So take that extra step to wash up, shave, put on some nice clothes, and smile during the rests as though you're enjoying waiting for your entrance. They'll see you smiling, and subconsciously smile and enjoy it too. If it's a mad angry piece, look mad and angry during those frantic passages. Think about how you look as well as how you play.

When you record yourself, make a VIDEO recording. I've been told I'm too boring, and so I need to work on moving a little MORE to the music. And we've had discussions about people who move so much sometimes they can border on distracting and keeping you AWAY from the music.

Just some thoughts I've had over the past few months after contemplating what makes a performance good, and what would warrant a callback.

Alexi

US Army Japan Band

Reply To Message
 
 Re: Some things I think makes a "pro" performer or group
Author: Lelia Loban 2017
Date:   2013-02-18 15:05

Alexi, since I've never seen or heard you play, I have no idea whether your own criteria apply to you, but it's clear you're a professional and the reason is under your signature:

>Clarinetist with the 282nd Army Band - Fort Jackson's Own
>

Namely: money. You're an Army musician. That means you get paid to play. That fact alone makes you a pro.

Your standards apply to things that qualify people to turn pro, or that qualify a pro to be well-respected, or make a pro a good musician, or all of the above. But the only solid, indisputable measure of professional or not professional is whether or not anyone will hire you.

Lelia
http://www.scoreexchange.com/profiles/Lelia_Loban
To hear the audio, click on the "Scorch Plug-In" box above the score.

Reply To Message
 
 Re: Some things I think makes a "pro" performer or group
Author: sfalexi 
Date:   2013-02-18 15:39

Quote:

Namely: money. You're an Army musician. That means you get paid to play. That fact alone makes you a pro.

Your standards apply to things that qualify people to turn pro, or that qualify a pro to be well-respected, or make a pro a good musician, or all of the above. But the only solid, indisputable measure of professional or not professional is whether or not anyone will hire you.
Well, yeah, people who get paid to play, or make a living would be considered a pro, in a stricter sense of the definition.

I think you phrased it better than I could stating that those standards are what I expect of a pro, and things that I think would help someone BECOME a pro. They are standards that I try to hold to myself (always a work in process), and what would keep me going from attending performances or keep me recommending someone for future work.

I was also thinking a little more "loose". As in people who act "professional". Someone can be a hobbyist with taking pictures, but when you ask them for a favor to take some pictures of you and your family they arrive on-time, prepared, have all their equipment and batteries charged, and leave you with the sense that you were just taken care of. And I wouldn't hesitate to recommend someone like that to others and use the phrase, "Oh yeah. She's a pro." Looser definition, but I was leaning more towards that sense.

US Army Japan Band

Reply To Message
 
 Re: Some things I think makes a "pro" performer or group
Author: DavidBlumberg 
Date:   2013-02-18 15:59

Remember, we are Entertainers

Have Artistic Integrity first and foremost, but Entertain!!



Audiences will come back.

http://www.SkypeClarinetLessons.com


Reply To Message
 
 Re: Some things I think makes a "pro" performer or group
Author: David Spiegelthal 2017
Date:   2013-02-19 02:34

David, maybe you're an Entertainer (capitalized like "Realtor", is it?), but when I sit in the next-to-back row of an orchestra where nobody can see me, I'm a Performer, not an Entertainer. I prefer to let the clown on the podium do the entertaining while we musicians do the performing.

As for the audiences, that's pretty much out of our hands. If the orchestra director programs a set of crap, then the audience will not return, regardless of whatever histrionics we perform on stage. Just my opinion.

Reply To Message
 
 Re: Some things I think makes a "pro" performer or group
Author: brycon 
Date:   2013-02-19 03:08

Quote:

Just been thinking about stuff. And I realize there are many musicians out there that are really truly great. I mean, there are clarinetists left and right who have technique out the wazoo.


I think that there are actually not very many clarinetists who can be said to have "technique out the wazoo," and what is more, even if one does have tremendous technical facility, that alone does not make a musician "truly great."

Quote:

But after some thinking and seeing/hearing what I consider to be some truly great musicians play over the recent past weeks, I've come up with a short list of things that I believe would help to get the gigs. Pros, I'm curious if you think these are important too.


This seems to be a thread not about what it means to be a great musician/artist but rather what it means to be a good business man/woman. In my opinion, this component of being a musician is rather commonsensical: be prepared and friendly. Or to put it more shrewdly: don't be a stupid a--hole.

Reply To Message
 
 Re: Some things I think makes a "pro" performer or group
Author: DavidBlumberg 
Date:   2013-02-19 04:34

David - nah, I was actually writing what the Philadelphia Orchestra Board said during the strike in the 90's.

I do see what you meant though, I don't like the cheesy stuff either.

Crossover went that direction.

http://www.SkypeClarinetLessons.com


Reply To Message
 Avail. Forums  |  Threaded View   Newer Topic  |  Older Topic 


 Avail. Forums  |  Need a Login? Register Here 
 User Login
 User Name:
 Password:
 Remember my login:
   
 Forgot Your Password?
Enter your email address or user name below and a new password will be sent to the email address associated with your profile.
Search Woodwind.Org

Sheet Music Plus Featured Sale

The Clarinet Pages
For Sale
Put your ads for items you'd like to sell here. Free! Please, no more than two at a time - ads removed after two weeks.

 
     Copyright © Woodwind.Org, Inc. All Rights Reserved    Privacy Policy    Contact charette@woodwind.org