The Clarinet BBoard
|
Author: Ralph G
Date: 2004-06-07 13:28
I believe I've mentioned here before how I've been tapped to play the first movement of Weber 2 with my chamber orchestra next spring. I think it's a decent solo choice -- relatively brief, somewhat easy for an amateur orchestra, it can stand alone as a complete-sounding composition, and it's a pretty decent technical piece requiring sound fundamentals.
Two colleagues in the local clarinet "clique" (one the clarinet prof at our local university) just went "ewww" when I told them what I was playing. They seem to regard the first movement as some torture you have to endure to get to the Polacca. Meanwhile, some other folks I know who aren't clarinet geeks but are familiar with the piece like it.
So is this too pedestrian a piece or something? What gives? Is this like going to Carnegie Hall and playing "Heart and Soul?"
Just wondering why I'm getting the ol' lemonface whenever I mention this to other clarinetists.e
________________
Artistic talent is a gift from God and whoever discovers it in himself has a certain obligation: to know that he cannot waste this talent, but must develop it.
- Pope John Paul II
|
|
|
Weber 2 Mvt 1: Boring? new |
|
Ralph G |
2004-06-07 13:28 |
|
RAMman |
2004-06-07 13:44 |
|
sfalexi |
2004-06-07 13:57 |
|
Ralph G |
2004-06-07 16:39 |
|
Clarinetist |
2004-06-07 18:18 |
|
Brad |
2004-06-07 18:53 |
|
Synonymous Botch |
2004-06-07 21:10 |
|
LeOpus1190s |
2004-06-07 22:50 |
|
EEBaum |
2004-06-07 23:21 |
|
Kevin |
2004-06-08 00:40 |
|
Ken Shaw |
2004-06-08 17:37 |
|
Ralph G |
2004-06-08 18:50 |
|
The Clarinet Pages
|
|