Klarinet Archive - Posting 000032.txt from 2010/11
From: Curtis Bennett <curtis.bennett@-----.com>
Subj: Re: [kl] What's Wrong with "Contemporary Classical"?
Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2010 11:02:46 -0400
I Don't think you'll find me arguing in favor of the musical merits of
"pop" music, though I admit I do like some.
I do love this group, however: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3DOvYZMqQffQE
But within the realm of "Classical" - I'll take Shostakovich or
Stravinsky, or even Penderecki over Mozart any day.
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 8:44 PM, Matthew Lloyd
> Whilst not wanting for a moment to pretend that the early Mozart symphoni=
> are works of genius, to say that they are "as boring as shit" really is a
> little juvenile. They are charming little pieces that deserve more attent=
> - and for what it is worth they are all on my iPhone. And I listen to the=
> Any and all of them display far more mature musicality than 99% of
> pop/rock/etc music.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Curtis Bennett [mailto:curtis.bennett@-----.com]
> Sent: 02 November 2010 21:08
> To: The Klarinet Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [kl] What's Wrong with "Contemporary Classical"?
> Look at how much Mozart gets zero play time these days.=A0 When was the
> last time an orchestra scheduled a performance of Mozart's - I don't
> know, any numbered symphony below 20.=A0=A0 Or anything by Haydn below
> #98. Hardly ever?=A0 You think an orchestra would have a sell-out
> performance with works by Telemann, early Hadyn symphonies and other
> lesser known early Classical composers?=A0 I doubt it. That stuff is
> boring as shit!
> Klarinet mailing list
> To do darn near anything to your subscription, go to:
Klarinet mailing list
To do darn near anything to your subscription, go to: