Klarinet Archive - Posting 000056.txt from 2005/12
From: Tom Flavel <tom@-----.net> Subj: Re: [kl] re[kl]: Trimming Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2005 15:26:02 -0500
On 10/12/2005 19:59:34, Matthew Lloyd wrote:
> Why does top posting carry such stigma? It's far more convenient to
> those who are not on a digest.
> Because it's confusing.
> > Why should I not top-post?
Whilst this contrived example may seem silly, on a larger scale, it's
more significant. Why? Because a mailing list reaches multiple people,
not all of whom have been following each conversation in-depth.
For people (like myself) jumping into a conversation midway, it's
difficult to figure out the order of events. Indeed, I just deleted
everything previous to this, because that's easier than attempting to
quote it chronologically.
One reason it gets tricky is because conversational threads fork and
rejoin. English reads top-to-bottom, so it seems natural for paragraph
order to also flow top-to-bottom.
Imagine a book with the paragraphs in a different order to the sentences!
--
Tom
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Klarinet is a service of Woodwind.Org, Inc. http://www.woodwind.org
|
|
 |