Advertising and Web Hosting on Woodwind.Org!

Klarinet Archive - Posting 000226.txt from 2005/04

From: "Dan Leeson" <dnleeson@-----.net>
Subj: RE: [kl] Test Results
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 19:10:07 -0400

I'm not prepared to consider that option. Everyone knew what the test was
before it started. Now saying that the test is the wrong one is something I
am not prepared to disucuss.

DNL

-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Flavel [mailto:tom@-----.net]On Behalf Of Tom Flavel
Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 3:57 PM
To: klarinet@-----.org
Subject: Re: [kl] Test Results

On 12/04/2005 15:48:39, Dan Leeson wrote:
> You missed my point. How can he argue that one of the hypotheses is
flawed
> while putting forward one equally flawed?

I don't know: I can't speak either on behalf of either of his views.

However, I do think your test had many variables. I realise it may be
difficult to instanstiate, but (I think Lelia suggested this) at least
have the players from different schools playing the same passage, if you
decide to put effort into orchestrating a second test.

--
Tom

-------------------------------------------------------------------
Klarinet is a service of Woodwind.Org, Inc. http://www.woodwind.org

-------------------------------------------------------------------
Klarinet is a service of Woodwind.Org, Inc. http://www.woodwind.org

   
     Copyright © Woodwind.Org, Inc. All Rights Reserved    Privacy Policy    Contact charette@woodwind.org