| Klarinet Archive - Posting 000747.txt from 2001/05 From: "Dee D. Hays" <deehays@-----.net>Subj: Re: [kl] Music education goals
 Date: Sun, 27 May 2001 14:41:32 -0400
 
 ----- Original Message -----
 From: "William Wright" <Bilwright@-----.net>
 Subject: Re: [kl] Music education goals
 
 >      <><> Dee Hays wrote:
 > But it doesn't have to be in front of an audience. A few weeks of
 > recorder training to play some basic tunes would equate to the basic lab
 > activities.
 >
 >
 >
 >      That's a good point.   But would you make one specific art
 > laboratory (such as music) mandatory without making the other arts
 > (visual, drama, dance, etc) mandatory?
 >
 >      I doubt that school districts in general could provide mandatory
 > education in _all_ of the arts at once.   This is why, of course, many
 > schools have a requirement for art of some sort, but the student is
 > allowed to choose which one.
 
 I have already stated that I will no longer debate what status any given
 subject should have in the school.  I changed the title deliberately to get
 off that subject.
 
 The posting to which I had responded had switched to addressing the content
 of the music course rather than the status of the course and my reply stayed
 within the limits of addressing the content.
 
 So as you can probably guess, I'm not going to comment to the points that
 you suggest.
 
 Dee Hays
 Michigan
 
 ---------------------------------------------------------------------
 Unsubscribe from Klarinet, e-mail: klarinet-unsubscribe@-----.org
 Subscribe to the Digest:           klarinet-digest-subscribe@-----.org
 Additional commands:               klarinet-help@-----.org
 Other problems:                    klarinet-owner@-----.org
 
 
 |  |  |