Klarinet Archive - Posting 000585.txt from 2001/04 
From: "Gene Nibbelin" <gnibbelin@-----.com> Subj: RE: [kl] Perlman and 'metamusic' Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2001 23:23:20 -0400
  Tony - 
 
May I assume that you wouldn't recommend Mr. Perlman for the position of 
Concertmeister?  Also, would you agree that it takes a better 
musician/clarinetist to be Principal Clarinetist with a major orchestra than 
it does to be a "prima donna" clarinet soloist? 
 
Gene Nibbelin 
 
-----Original Message----- 
From:	Tony Pay [mailto:Tony@-----.uk] 
Subject:	[kl] Perlman and 'metamusic' 
 
Neil Leupold recently posted a wonderful report of a Perlman concert. 
Since the subject of 'meta-music', and what that might include, has also 
been under discussion, I'd like to put forward the notion that what the 
reviewer in this report was commenting on can be thought of as belonging to 
that category.  Perlman clearly did here something both courageous and 
important, deserving of great respect.  Moreover it was something belonging 
to the music, yet in a way, belonging to a situation beyond it. 
However, I have my own story to tell about Perlman, who is of course a 
superlative violinist.  I tell this story here in order to make our picture 
of him more complete, rather than to challenge what has already been said 
about him.  The story also illustrates something about music, or meta-music, 
that I think is very important. 
A few years ago, Perlman gave a series of concerts with the Philharmonia 
Orchestra in London, playing most of the standard repertoire: Beethoven, 
Brahms, Mendelssohn, Tchaikowsky and so on.  I was delighted to have been 
asked to play guest principal in the orchestra, because there are wonderful 
opportunities for the clarinet in all these pieces-in a way, more 
opportunities than I'd bargained for, I found, in the last movement of the 
Barber:-) 
One of the concerts included the Sibelius concerto.  This work is very dear 
to my heart, perhaps partly because I once fell in love (as it happened, 
uselessly) with a beautiful girl, still a friend of mine, who won an 
important competition playing it.  But quite apart from that, I'd have to 
say that it's one of the masterpieces of the violin concerto repertoire. 
The slow movement is particularly profound. 
There is a masterstroke in that movement towards the end, when both 
orchestra and violin begin together in crescendo, the orchestra playing the 
main melody; and, as this crescendo develops, the violin is progressively 
and inevitably submerged, so that when the full orchestral climax occurs, 
there is the sense of a universal statement; a sort of total outpouring of 
emotion beyond anything personal. 
But then, miraculously, as the orchestra subsides after resolving the 
shattering climactic dissonance, the solo violin is revealed again, in a 
wonderful little ascending scale with a sigh at the end, as though to say 
that the truth of the world is both universal and particular. 
Or so I think. 
Anyway, when we rehearsed this bit in the Festival Hall on the afternoon of 
the concert, Perlman said something to the conductor, whose name I don't 
remember-he was just a competent someone who came with the deal, I suppose. 
This conductor then told the orchestra, "Crescendo only to mezzo-forte at 
that point, ladies and gentlemen!" 
I couldn't believe it.  "I beg your pardon?" I found myself saying. 
"Take the crescendo only to mezzo-forte," he repeated. 
"But, Sibelius writes 'tutta forza' for the orchestra at the top of that 
crescendo," I said. 
"Yes, but then you can't hear the violin." 
"Well, that's Sibelius's idea, isn't it?  What else could 'tutta forza' 
mean?" 
"Just keep it down there for Mr Perlman," I was told. 
Mr Perlman himself kept his back firmly to the orchestra throughout this 
exchange. 
Perlman, you see, has always to be the centre of the audience's attention. 
A very eminent conductor friend of mine said that though he'd worked once 
with Perlman, he wouldn't again.  "No point," he said. 
And another friend who has recorded chamber works with Perlman told me that 
Perlman has the final decision over the balance in the final edit, 
regardless of what his colleagues think, because he's had that written into 
his contract.  The violin part is therefore usually placed well forward in 
Perlman's recordings, and his colleagues aren't always happy with the 
musical results.  But, so what? 
As I said before, Perlman is a wonderful violinist, and even a wonderful and 
inspiring musician.  His struggle against his disability is likewise 
inspiring. 
Perhaps he's not always so strong on the 'meta-music', though. 
Tony 
-- 
_________       Tony Pay 
|ony:-)      79 Southmoor Rd              Tony@-----.uk 
|   |ay      Oxford OX2 6RE          GMN artist: http://www.gmn.com 
tel/fax 01865 553339 
...                                                    (Invisible Tagline) 
 
--------------------------------------------------------------------- 
Unsubscribe from Klarinet, e-mail: klarinet-unsubscribe@-----.org 
Subscribe to the Digest:           klarinet-digest-subscribe@-----.org 
Additional commands:               klarinet-help@-----.org 
Other problems:                    klarinet-owner@-----.org 
 
--------------------------------------------------------------------- 
Unsubscribe from Klarinet, e-mail: klarinet-unsubscribe@-----.org 
Subscribe to the Digest:           klarinet-digest-subscribe@-----.org 
Additional commands:               klarinet-help@-----.org 
Other problems:                    klarinet-owner@-----.org 
 
 
 | 
  | 
  |