Advertising and Web Hosting on Woodwind.Org!

Klarinet Archive - Posting 000216.txt from 1999/04

From: David Blumberg <reedman@-----.com>
Subj: [kl] re: Plastic Bundy
Date: Sun, 4 Apr 1999 11:11:27 -0400

At 09:22 PM 4/3/99 -0600, Roger Garrett wrote:
>On Sat, 3 Apr 1999, Bill Hausmann wrote:
>> Are you saying that, if we could convince a player that a plastic clarinet
>> is SUPERIOR to a wood one, that, as a result of that perception, he will
>> play BETTER on the plastic one? That is not the difference in material but
>> the player's PERCEPTION of the material that matters?
>
>A player's perception of the sound, as a result of the response and the
>resistance or lack of such, matters. The material affects the latter
>issues, so therefore the sound is affected.
>
The sound could be affected for better OR WORSE, then, right? The
resistance, response, etc. of a plastic Bundy may suit the player better
than that of a Buffet Prestige or Selmer Signature and result in better
tone being produced?
Bill Hausmann bhausman@-----.com
451 Old Orchard Drive http://www.concentric.net/~bhausman
Essexville, MI 48732 http://members.wbs.net/homepages/z/o/o/zoot14.html
ICQ UIN 4862265

----------------------------------------

Can a plastic Bundy suit anybody for anything except Javelin practice? I don't
think that anyone, anywhere can get a better sound on a Bundy then from a
Signature, or Prestige. It's like comparing a car with 115 HP to one with 275
in a race (at the same weight).

David Blumberg
playit@-----.com

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe from Klarinet, e-mail: klarinet-unsubscribe@-----.org
Subscribe to the Digest: klarinet-digest-subscribe@-----.org
Additional commands: klarinet-help@-----.org
Other problems: klarinet-owner@-----.org

   
     Copyright © Woodwind.Org, Inc. All Rights Reserved    Privacy Policy    Contact charette@woodwind.org