| Klarinet Archive - Posting 000912.txt from 1998/04 From: Jonathan Cohler <cohler@-----.net>Subj: Re:  klarinet-digest V2 #78
 Date: Fri, 17 Apr 1998 06:05:33 -0400
 
 Hat NYC 62 wrote:
 
 >>>Of course, if this exclusionary practice is common among full-time
 >symphonies now (which I refuse to believe until shown the contrary), and I
 >would love to know which other orchestras do this, then as teachers we
 >should advise our students to make "creative" resumes, and pull as many
 >back-door, "old-boys-club" strings as we know of every time we send a
 >student out for a first-round audition into these old-boy-clubs.<<
 >
 >The only major symphony I know of that does not weed out candidates based on
 >resume or tape is the Chicago Symphony. Virtually all other major orchestras
 >require a tape or simply reject candidates. These include:
 >
 >Cleveland Orchestra
 >Boston Symphony
 >Baltimore Symphony
 >Metropolitan Opera
 >Kennedy Center Opera
 >Los Angeles Philharmonic
 >Dallas Symphony
 >San Francisco Symphony
 
 Tape is a different story.  That is a valid audition of a person's playing
 ability.  I was discussing orchestras which exclude people based on resume
 alone.  Which is completely meaningless.  A piece of paper tells you
 nothing of ones playing ability in orchestra or otherwise.
 
 I don't believe your list above is correct.  I know, for example, that the
 Boston Symphony hears people who want to audition.
 
 Which of those exclude based on resume alone?
 
 -------------------
 Jonathan Cohler
 cohler@-----.net
 
 
 |  |  |