| Klarinet Archive - Posting 000415.txt from 1997/12 From: Kenneth M Caputo <kcaputo1@-----.edu>Subj: RE: Slander, etc
 Date: Tue,  9 Dec 1997 09:09:55 -0500
 
 I would like to try to put my 2 cents in on this matter.  In todays
 orchestra it is very rare to see a Basset clarinety being used in a
 regular manner.. I have heard and played the aria in question.  Each
 time I played it on the Soprano Bb clar. I would like to point out that
 other clarinet players have also played the basset part on regular b
 flat. when I heartd this aria performed by the Montreal Symphony,
 Cecilia Bartolli sang while the The clarinetist played on the Regular b-
 flat.....how come we are soooooooo bent out of shap with this one
 aria.......????........  Why do we still play the concerto (K622) in
 regular A?????>>>>>>  I have not heard anyone get all bent out of shape
 that all the great recordings by Leister, Gigliotti and Marcellus(sp)
 played the concerto on the regular A and not Basset.   If you want to hear
 the Basset in action find a recording by Hogwood.  It is not Morales'
 fault about what notes he played.  The fault goes to a man with the last
 name of Andre.  He published many of Mozart's works, when he did so the
 basset clarinet was not avalible.
 ken
 On Mon, 8 Dec 1997, Dan Leeson: LEESON@-----.edu
 wrote:
 
 > > From:	MX%"klarinet@-----.35
 > > Subj:	Slander, etc
 >
 > > Gee Dan,
 > >
 > > First you chastise someone for attacking poor, defenseless Gervaise de Peyer,
 > > then you write THIS? Hmm. . .
 >
 > If you cannot see the difference between the attacks on de Payer's playing
 > ability including sound, general musicianship, etc. and this highly
 > complimentary criticism of Morales' playing, then you are having
 > trouble dealing with grammar, syntax, and meaning.
 >
 > I could not have been more complimentary to Morales.  I could not have
 > been more appreciative of his playing.  But I also mentioned a specific,
 > non-arguable element of what he played as being wrong.  I said nothing
 > negative about how he played.  I dealt only with an issue that cannot
 > be contradicted; i.e., Mozart calls for one set of notes, Morales played
 > another.  Now it is true that someone suggested that this was not as
 > important as I believe it to be, but no one contradicted my facts.  I
 > think it important.  Others don't.  That's not criticizing his playing.
 > Don't you see the difference or are you just being deliberately obtuse?
 >
 > You really insult my intelligence by suggesting that the vitriolic attacks
 > on de Payer are indistinguishable from my remarks on Morales' failure to
 > recognize the original text of the aria as Mozart wrote it.  Worse, you
 > show yourself to be unable to distinguish between criticism of how a
 > person plays from what a person plays.
 >
 >
 > >
 > > Date: Sat, 06 Dec 1997 11:51:47 EST
 > > From: "Dan Leeson: LEESON@-----.edu>
 > > Subject: Today's Titus on the Met Broadcast
 > >
 > > I admit that I stood in absolute awe of Morales' control and intelligence
 > > in the performing of the great Parto aria which employs an obliggato
 > > clarinet to such a stunning effect.  It finished not 10 minutes ago.
 > >
 > > But the bottom line is that, despite the 1000 positive things one can
 > > say about the performance, the fact remains that he played it on the
 > > wrong clarinet!  The part is written for a basset clarinet in B-flat
 > > and it was performed   on a standard clarinet in B-flat.
 > >
 > > There are four  reasons why he might have done this:
 > >
 > > 	1) The conductor insisted on a performance played on
 > > 	traditional clarinet;
 > >
 > > 	2) Morales was unable to find a basset clarinet that
 > > 	had the required professional characteristics and thus
 > > 	was compelled to ignore the explicit performance
 > > 	instructions;
 > >
 > > 	3) Morales would have like to played in on the proper
 > > 	instrument but does not own one and decided not to
 > > 	incur the expense of one for such a rare occasion;
 > >
 > > 	4) Morales does not know for what instrument the work
 > > 	is scored.
 > >
 > > I am sympathetic to the first two, very much less sympathetic to
 > > the third but consider the fourth the most likely.
 > >
 > > Morales is such an incredible talent and such a magnificent player
 > > that I believe he left college before completing his course of study.
 > > I am told that he began to play professionally at about the age of
 > > 20, a testament to his extraordinary technical facility.  As such,
 > > it is unlikely that he had little opportunity to get to know things
 > > associated with music outside of playing.  Bottom line is that I
 > > suspect that he never found out about the clarinet revolution
 > > currently in progress with the availability of contemporary
 > > basset clarinets and thus does not know that the part that he played
 > > on the radio is rife with wrong notes, "wrong" in the sense that they
 > > are not what Mozart wrote, they are occasionally an octave too high,
 > > and the balance of the aria is upset to some degree every time such
 > > an event occurs, and thus the entire aria is thrown out of kilter.
 > >
 > > It distresses me to think that he does know about the basset clarinet
 > > but does not consider it a very important thing.  So I won't credit
 > > the problem to this phenomenon.
 > >
 > > Over the last week or two, the subject of "what the composer intended"
 > > has come up on this list a dozen times.  Well, here we have a very
 > > practical case.  What the composer intended was NOT played, and instead
 > > a modified version created ca. 1800 to fit a clarinet of reduced
 > > range was substituted.  And neither the composer nor the aria were
 > > well served by this activity.
 > >
 > > Can Morales play well?  He's breathtaking.  Does he play intelligently?
 > > He is a joy to hear.  Is he aware of the relationship between performance
 > > practice and proper execution of music from this era?  I think not.
 > >
 > > And it makes no difference if no one in the world including Morales knows
 > > what he did.  It is our duty to find out about these things and to do
 > > them, not for ourselves, but for the music.  That is what constitutes
 > > the highest level of professionalism.
 > >
 > > =======================================
 > > Dan Leeson, Los Altos, California
 > > Rosanne Leeson, Los Altos, California
 > > leeson@-----.edu
 > > =======================================
 > =======================================
 > Dan Leeson, Los Altos, California
 > Rosanne Leeson, Los Altos, California
 > leeson@-----.edu
 > =======================================
 >
 
 
 |  |  |