Klarinet Archive - Posting 000062.txt from 2011/02

From: dickwilliams <dickwilliams@-----.com>
Subj: Re: [kl] Dvorak 9 query
Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 21:36:08 -0500

THX, Karl
O.K.! I am happy now.
...we also noted cue oddity in re flue/odoe

THX, again

----- Original Message -----
From: Karl Krelove <kkrelove@-----.net>
To: 'The Klarinet Mailing List' <klarinet@-----.com>
Subject: Re: [kl] Dvorak 9 query
Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 20:30:39 -0500

>Dick, I don't have a part from an identifiable publisher
>(although the only part I think I've ever played from is
>the Kalmus part). But if I look at the 1st clarinet part in
>the OMCDRL collection or the copy that's available at IMSLP
>(which I suspect is the same as the part you have), I see
>the difference you mention. But looking at my own copy of a
>Kalmus score (which I think was a reprint of the original
>Simrock edition) and also at the copy IMSLP has, the
>clarinet articulations are identical to the flute, which
>not only plays the passage _solo_ beginning in the 9th bar
>of 10, but also plays it in octaves with the clarinet and
>the 1st bassoon 8 bars later. The articulation I see in the
>part I'm looking at in the 21st bar of 10 is a slur over
>dots and the articulation two bars later is a dot over only
>the second of the two eighth-notes. These seem like such
>pointlessly fussy articulations in context (and so easy to
>explain as engraving errors) that I'd question them much
>sooner than I'd question the score.
>
>Of slight interest (maybe to suggest that the parts are
>less reliable than the score in this case) is the fact that
>in the bassoon part there is a cue that begins in the 13th
>measure of 10 showing the flute solo - only the cue is
>labeled "Oboi 1." :-)
>
>Karl
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: dickwilliams [mailto:dickwilliams@-----.com]
>Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2011 7:35 PM
>To: The Klarinet Mailing List
>Subject: [kl] Dvorak 9 query
>
>It the first movement of Dvorak 9, in the 9th measure after
>rehearsal 10, the flute has an 8 bar phrase with the two
>staccato eighths at the beginning of the odd numbered
>measures. The phrase is echoed in the next 8 measures by
>the first clarinet but with a different articulation in
>measures 21 and 23. Anyone have suggested articulations
>and justifications?
>
>Dick WIlliams
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Klarinet mailing list
>Klarinet@-----.com
>To do darn near anything to your subscription, go to:
>http://klarinet-list.serve-music.com
_______________________________________________
Klarinet mailing list
Klarinet@-----.com
To do darn near anything to your subscription, go to:
http://klarinet-list.serve-music.com