Klarinet Archive - Posting 000085.txt from 2010/08

From: Tony Pay <tony.p@-----.org>
Subj: Re: [kl] Fundamental error on
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 12:46:28 -0400

On 12 Aug 2010, at 20:48, Diego Casadei wrote, in part:

> I made a measurement, just to cross check what I wrote in my first email.

Well, what you say certainly does seem to make a lot of sense. I'm checking out the references you give, but I think I've learnt something here -- though I have to say 8 cm seems awfully large.

I never really went into what counts as received wisdom about the reed behaving like the closed end of the tube, thinking that it was counterintuitive because of some subtlety about how the boundary conditions were applied.

(Obviously, if you're right, this is the error that Ken Shaw thought the paper was 'full of':-)

Tony
--
Tony Pay
79 Southmoor Rd
Oxford OX2 6RE
tel/fax +44 1865 553339
mobile +44 7790 532980
tony.p@-----.org

_______________________________________________
Klarinet mailing list
Klarinet@-----.com
To do darn near anything to your subscription, go to:
http://klarinet-list.serve-music.com