Klarinet Archive - Posting 000055.txt from 2010/08

From: "Peter Gentry" <peter.gentry@-----.uk>
Subj: Re: [kl] Fundamental error
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 12:28:57 -0400

My last post seems to have vanished. I think more light could be shed by a
careful study of
http://www.phys.unsw.edu.au/jw/woodwind.html

-----Original Message-----
From: Tony Pay [mailto:tony.p@-----.org]
Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2010 5:21 PM
To: The Klarinet Mailing List
Subject: Re: [kl] Fundamental error
onhttp://www.woodwindcourse.co.uk/user/image/clarinet_bore_design.doc

On 12 Aug 2010, at 16:55, dickwilliams wrote:

> Octave???
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Keith Bowen <keith.bowen@-----.com>
> To: The Klarinet Mailing List <klarinet@-----.com>
> Subject: Re: [kl] Fundamental error on
> http://www.woodwindcourse.co.uk/user/image/clarinet_bore_design.doc
> Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 15:44:00 +0100
>
>> The difference between you is that Tony is right and you
>> are "not"!
>>
>> Do read the references he suggests.
>> It isn't very intuitive, but it is why a clarinet behaves
>> differently from an oboe or flute(hence is an octave lower
>> for the same tube length).

Yes, octave; the fundamental on a clarinet has a wavelength of twice its
length, the flute and oboe a wavelength equal to their lengths. Hence the
frequencies are in the ratio of 1:2, ie an octave.

Tony
--

Tony Pay
79 Southmoor Rd
Oxford OX2 6RE
tel/fax +44 1865 553339
mobile +44 7790 532980
tony.p@-----.org

_______________________________________________
Klarinet mailing list
Klarinet@-----.com
To do darn near anything to your subscription, go to:
http://klarinet-list.serve-music.com

_______________________________________________
Klarinet mailing list
Klarinet@-----.com
To do darn near anything to your subscription, go to:
http://klarinet-list.serve-music.com