Klarinet Archive - Posting 000226.txt from 2010/07

From: bhausmann1@-----.net
Subj: Re: [kl] Sheet music copyright
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 19:58:31 -0400

I will concede the difference in duration, but only because intellectual property is most valuable early in its life, and is of no benefit to the originator after his death.
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry

-----Original Message-----
From: Joseph Wakeling <joseph.wakeling@-----.net>
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 17:55:11
To: <klarinet@-----.com>
Reply-To: The Klarinet Mailing List <klarinet@-----.com>
Subject: Re: [kl] Sheet music copyright

On 07/13/2010 04:06 AM, Bill Hausmann wrote:
> The law largely DOES agree, or there would be no copyright law.

There's a world of difference between an intentionally finite,
short-term monopoly on reproduction, whose intent is the long-term
expansion of the public domain, and the kind of strong rights associated
with physical property.
_______________________________________________
Klarinet mailing list
Klarinet@-----.com
To do darn near anything to your subscription, go to:
http://klarinet-list.serve-music.com
_______________________________________________
Klarinet mailing list
Klarinet@-----.com
To do darn near anything to your subscription, go to:
http://klarinet-list.serve-music.com