Klarinet Archive - Posting 000018.txt from 2010/05

From: gabe ferreira <overlord1294@-----.com>
Subj: Re: [kl] Weber Quintet urtext
Date: Thu, 06 May 2010 00:09:16 -0400

Nothing, he stated that as far as he knows there is not urtext edition, my
experience with schott in terms of quality print/accuracy has been good, so
I am just throwing this out there.... Dan

On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 6:54 PM, Dan Leeson <dnleeson@-----.net> wrote:

> But what makes you think that the Schott edition is Urtext?
>
> Dan Leeson
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Gabe" <overlord1294@-----.com>
> To: "The Klarinet Mailing List" <klarinet@-----.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 05, 2010 4:47 PM
> Subject: Re: [kl] Weber Quintet urtext
>
>
> > There is a study score of the quintet by edition schott, I am assuming
> > that there is a set of parts also.
> >
> > Sent from my iPhone
> >
> > On May 5, 2010, at 3:56 PM, Sean Osborn <feanor33@-----.net> wrote:
> >
> >> Dear List,
> >>
> >> I understand there is no Urtext to the Weber Quintet (I hope my
> >> sources are incorrect). Do any of you have a good edition to
> >> recommend? Does anyone know why there is no manuscript faximile or
> >> urtext?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> Sean
> >> www.osbornmusic.com
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Klarinet mailing list
> >> Klarinet@-----.com
> >> http://klarinet-list.serve-music.com
> > _______________________________________________
> > Klarinet mailing list
> > Klarinet@-----.com
> > http://klarinet-list.serve-music.com
> _______________________________________________
> Klarinet mailing list
> Klarinet@-----.com
> http://klarinet-list.serve-music.com
>
_______________________________________________
Klarinet mailing list
Klarinet@-----.com
http://klarinet-list.serve-music.com