Klarinet Archive - Posting 000013.txt from 2010/05

From: "Dan Leeson" <dnleeson@-----.net>
Subj: Re: [kl] Weber Quintet urtext
Date: Wed, 05 May 2010 21:54:54 -0400

But what makes you think that the Schott edition is Urtext?

Dan Leeson
----- Original Message -----
From: "Gabe" <overlord1294@-----.com>
To: "The Klarinet Mailing List" <klarinet@-----.com>
Sent: Wednesday, May 05, 2010 4:47 PM
Subject: Re: [kl] Weber Quintet urtext

> There is a study score of the quintet by edition schott, I am assuming
> that there is a set of parts also.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On May 5, 2010, at 3:56 PM, Sean Osborn <feanor33@-----.net> wrote:
>
>> Dear List,
>>
>> I understand there is no Urtext to the Weber Quintet (I hope my
>> sources are incorrect). Do any of you have a good edition to
>> recommend? Does anyone know why there is no manuscript faximile or
>> urtext?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Sean
>> www.osbornmusic.com
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Klarinet mailing list
>> Klarinet@-----.com
>> http://klarinet-list.serve-music.com
> _______________________________________________
> Klarinet mailing list
> Klarinet@-----.com
> http://klarinet-list.serve-music.com
_______________________________________________
Klarinet mailing list
Klarinet@-----.com
http://klarinet-list.serve-music.com