Klarinet Archive - Posting 000065.txt from 2009/05

From: Roger Hewitt <rogerclarinet@-----.uk>
Subj: [kl] Re: reading and replying ettiquette
Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 17:58:39 -0400


Reading headers only is often fruitless. I'm replying to a message subject=
of:=0A=0A"Re: klarinet Digest 25 May 2009 09:01:02 -0000 Issue 8348"=0A=0A=
That, of course, tells me exactly what the content is about?=0AI've got int=
o a habit of just deleting anything with that sort of subject, I only read =
this because there have been so few postings of any sort recently! It help=
s a lot if you keep the subject line relevant to content especially when a =
rambling thread has veered into different territory from where it started.=
=0A=0ARoger H=0A=0A=0A--- On Mon, 25/5/09, James Leonard Hobby <jhobby@tnet=
s.net> wrote:=0A=0A> From: James Leonard Hobby <jhobby@-----.net>=0A> Subje=
ct: [kl] Re: klarinet Digest 25 May 2009 09:01:02 -0000 Issue 8348=0A> To: =
klarinet@-----.org=0A> Date: Monday, 25 May, 2009, 10:39 PM=0A> Giood lu=
ck.=A0 I have complained=0A> about it several times, with no luck.=A0 Now=
=0A> I just read the headers and never read the whole thing and=0A> haven't=
replied=0A> for months.=A0 Jim=0A> =0A> > From: "Clinton F. Nieweg" <proof=
ferr@-----.com>=0A> > Subject: Re:question on e-mail posting=0A> > ---=0A> =
> Would there be more discussions if the posters removed=0A> much of inform=
ation in the previous messages? It is=0A> difficult when receiving the dige=
st to see what is a new=0A> post and what is one of many questions and answ=
ers.=0A> > =0A> =0A> =0A> This Email has been scanned for viruses, courtesy=
of=0A> Tnets.net=0A> =0A> ------------------------------------------------=
org,=0A> klarinet-digest-unsubscribe@-----.org=0A> if you get the digest=
: email klarinet-owner@-----.org=0A> =0A> =0A=0A=0A

------------------------------------------------------------------