Klarinet Archive - Posting 000063.txt from 2009/02
From: Tony Pay <tony.p@-----.org> Subj: Re: [kl] Brahms quintet Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2009 13:37:28 -0500
On 3 Feb, Jonathan Cohler <cohler@-----.org> wrote:
> I said nothing about the "simplicity" of the fingerings. I said they were
> smoother, more in tune, more resonant etc. as a whole (not one particular
> note but the entire passage).
>
> The physics of this is rather obvious and too boring to get into.
I remember your explanations of 'obvious' physics from the Bulletin Board;-)
For the rest of us, however, the nub of the issue is roughly whether or not
there are more 'forked' fingerings in an F# minor arpeggio than there are
in an F minor arpeggio. And as I pointed out, that's a function of the
clarinet system.
> But if you propose that my statement is untrue, then why do you suppose
> Mühlfeld played it that way? Did he want it to be less in tune, less
> resonant, and less smooth?
It's a mystery, isn't it? However, I made a suggestion in the 2000 post I
referenced.
Tony
--
_________ Tony Pay
|ony:-) 79 Southmoor Rd
| |ay Oxford OX2 6RE
tel/fax 01865 553339
mobile +44(0)7790 532980 tony.p@-----.org
... Too many freaks, not enough circuses.
------------------------------------------------------------------
The 2009 Woodwind.Org Donation Drive is going on right now - see
https://secure.donax-us.com/donation/ for more information.
------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|