Klarinet Archive - Posting 000061.txt from 2009/02
From: Tony Pay <tony.p@-----.org> Subj: Re: [kl] Brahms quintet Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2009 13:20:57 -0500
On 3 Feb, "Alexander Brash" <brash@-----.edu> wrote:
> Since Jonathan didn't state what he meant by obvious physics in his
> original post, I'm not sure we can assume he simply means ease of
> fingering.
No, he didn't. I understood what he meant. What he said is true on the
Boehm clarinet -- namely that C# and F# are 'forked' fingerings in an F#
minor arpeggio, whereas C and F aren't. However, the opposite is true on the
Ottensteiner, which is why his judgement about what Brahms 'no doubt'
preferred is parochial.
> I find it unlikely he's referring to the physics of the fingers (in terms
> of ease of playing), and more likely he's referring to the physics of the
> harmonics involved.
Yes.
> I'd be willing to bet he's right, but since I don't know enough about it, I
> can't give an argument in support...
Oh.
Tony
--
_________ Tony Pay
|ony:-) 79 Southmoor Rd
| |ay Oxford OX2 6RE
tel/fax 01865 553339
mobile +44(0)7790 532980 tony.p@-----.org
... I've found Jesus. He was behind the sofa the whole time.
------------------------------------------------------------------
The 2009 Woodwind.Org Donation Drive is going on right now - see
https://secure.donax-us.com/donation/ for more information.
------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|