Klarinet Archive - Posting 000144.txt from 2009/01

From: clarni bass <clarnibass@-----.com>
Subj: RE: [kl] Rap discussion
Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2009 04:50:08 -0500

Those of us who don't believe in some made up fictional character being res=
ponsible for everything might disagree....
=A0
Do you claim to know ALL rap...? If not, don't generalize about all rap lik=
e you do (I still don't understand why you do this).
=A0
If you dont know all rap, do you understand the rap you do know? If not, th=
en accept that you don't and that you just don't like it.
=A0
Not to mention many things you wrote as "facts" which were simply wrong....=
.
=A0
In that specific quote (and this is completely seperate=A0from anything els=
e I think him and his music) Bach=A0is very wrong, and he's dead, so he is=
=A0dead wrong....
=A0

--- On Thu, 1/8/09, Peter Gentry <peter.gentry@-----.uk> wrote:

From: Peter Gentry <peter.gentry@-----.uk>
Subject: RE: [kl] Rap discussion
To: klarinet@-----.org
Date: Thursday, January 8, 2009, 11:20 AM

Obvious realy, it is Bach's definition of music as sounds produced to
enhance and uplift. Not just a guttural steram of expectoration. I'm with
Bach.

regards
Peter Gentry=20

-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Charette [mailto:charette@-----.org]=20
Sent: 08 January 2009 04:01
To: klarinet@-----.org
Subject: Re: [kl] Rap discussion

Bill Hausmann wrote:
> I saw this posted in a band room today and thought it relevant to the=20
> discussion here on whether rap is music:
Why is it relevant?

------------------------------------------------------------------

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com=20
Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.4/1880 - Release Date: 07/01/2009
08:49

------------------------------------------------------------------

=0A=0A=0A

------------------------------------------------------------------