Klarinet Archive - Posting 000105.txt from 2008/10

From: "Keith" <bowenk@-----.com>
Subj: RE: [kl] Karl Leister K.622
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 10:55:43 -0400

Because they are embellished versions of it? Falling fourth as the basis,
with the interval filled with appoggiaturas and passing notes; which
indicates stress on the appoggiaturas? The third bar is two repeats of the
first bar figure, transposed one bar down; which indicates playing it
largely the same way as the first bar, but with the second half weaker than
the first half, for classical metrical accent pattern?

Keith Bowen

> Oh rats.

[snip]

I wasn't thinking of echoes of other works.

A hint might be: why do I say that the second bar of the clarinet concerto
is
'the same' as the both the first bar and either half of the third bar?

That took me some 35 years to realise.

Tony
--

_________ Tony Pay
|ony:-) 79 Southmoor Rd
| |ay Oxford OX2 6RE
tel/fax 01865 553339
mobile +44(0)7790 532980 tony.p@-----.org

------------------------------------------------------------------

__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature
database 3538 (20081020) __________

The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

http://www.eset.com

__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature
database 3538 (20081020) __________

The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

http://www.eset.com

------------------------------------------------------------------