Klarinet Archive - Posting 000072.txt from 2008/08

From: Joseph Wakeling <joseph.wakeling@-----.net>
Subj: Re: [kl] Poulenc Sonata- to Tony Pay
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 10:35:26 -0400

sarah elbaz wrote:
> Tony, Sean and all the list members,
>
> This discussion about the Poulenc sonata is not so simple.
> In Tony's attachements we see the 'problematic' notes in the manuscript.
> But I suppose that Tony knows that there are two manuscripts for the Poulenc sonata
> and that is the reason for the arguments about the four notes between Tony and the French players.
> Guy Deplus ,for example, says that the notes are different and he is very positive about that.
> Philippe Cuper also talked about that in the master class in Northwestern Uni.
> The issue here is why Tony chose that manuscript and not the other one
> and what are the MUSICAL arguments for that?.

Here are some posts on the matter:
http://test.woodwind.org/Databases/Klarinet/2003/04/001233.txt
http://test.woodwind.org/Databases/Klarinet/1999/01/001310.txt

The summary seems to be that Poulenc revised his ms before publication,
but some players are going with what was in the manuscript prior to this
revision.

------------------------------------------------------------------