Klarinet Archive - Posting 000197.txt from 2007/06

From: Audrey Travis <clr91nt@-----.ca>
Subj: Re: [kl] Accidental Usage Question
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 14:46:40 -0400


I've been wrong before. I stand corrected. I was indeed thinking of
music before 1900.

A.
On 29-Jun-07, at 11:34 AM, Glenn Kantor wrote:

> "...> All same note names of any octave within the same measure. The
> bar
>> line at the end of the measure cancels accidentals and one reverts to
>> the key signature unless an accidental is used in the following
>> measure. It's common knowledge...."
>
>
> Even in 12 tone music? I don't think so.
>
> As a general rule any music before 1900, the accidentals affect ALL
> octaves.
>
> After 1900 - it depends on the composer and the "language/rule" he has
> specifically chosen (or the editor has chosen0 . Check other passages
> in the same piece.
>
> Glenn B Kantor (GBK)
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Audrey Travis" <clr91nt@-----.ca>
> To: <klarinet@-----.org>
> Sent: Friday, June 29, 2007 2:11 PM
> Subject: Re: [kl] Accidental Usage Question
>
>
>> All same note names of any octave within the same measure. The bar
>> line at the end of the measure cancels accidentals and one reverts to
>> the key signature unless an accidental is used in the following
>> measure. It's common knowledge.
>>
>> Audrey
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>

------------------------------------------------------------------