Klarinet Archive - Posting 000255.txt from 2006/10

From: "Keith Bowen" <bowenk@-----.com>
Subj: RE: [kl] Keith's comments
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 11:02:06 -0400

I don't think he played an eingang plus a cadenza, I should have been
clearer (and yes I know the difference, learned from you!).

He played what I would describe as a cadenza-like eingang, not merely a
brief transition from dominant to tonic. It was one or two minutes of
cadenza-like stuff, so you could call it a very, very, very over-elaborate
eingang I suppose, in that he went from dominant to tonic eventually. I have
no idea whether he did it on the spot or had it prepared. I thought the
style jarred.

Keith

> -----Original Message-----
> From: klarinet-return-89068-bowenk=compuserve.com@-----.org
> [mailto:klarinet-return-89068-bowenk=compuserve.com@-----.org] On
> Behalf Of dnleeson
> Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 3:16 PM
> To: klarinet@-----. org
> Subject: [kl] Keith's comments
>
>
> One more thing, Keith. We may be talking about two different
> things here with respect to the Meyer's performance of K. 581 and
> Neidich's performance of the same work.
>
> I need further information about exactly what Neidich did.
> Charlie Neidich is very familiar with these issues and I do not
> believe that he would have played an Eingang and then a Cadenza.
> I also find it hard to believe that he would have played a
> Cadenza instead of an Eingang. He might have played an
> over-elaborate Eingang, but that remains to be seen. And finally,
> whoever wrote the notes that you quoted might not know an Eingang
> from an Italian plum. The story is too confusing.
>
> Dan Leeson
> DNLeeson@-----.net
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> Klarinet is a service of Woodwind.Org, Inc. http://www.woodwind.org

-------------------------------------------------------------------
Klarinet is a service of Woodwind.Org, Inc. http://www.woodwind.org