Klarinet Archive - Posting 000345.txt from 2006/03

From: "Rommel John Miller" <rjmiller@-----.net>
Subj: Re: [kl] Rossi quality flaw
Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2006 16:02:55 -0500

No, I was of course refering to my own "bamboozled" manner in which WWBW has
been dealing with me and sending me what seem to me (and others I have
consulted) are "seconds" at best. Becasue there is something wrong with
every single (1,2, and 3) R-13 that WWBW sent me.

That is why I personally contacted Francois Kloc, but he doesn't bother to
return e-mails or phone calls.

The claims that WWBW make, weighed against the sub-standard clarinets I have
recieved from them, substandard to the point that is, that I would have to
take the "NEW" R-13 WWBW to a private NAPBIRTS certified technician, and
spend more of my own money to fix a problem WWBW is by right of an implied
contractual Warranty, is liable for, and to ensure that only Fully Passed
and high quality instruments, in this case Buffet Clarinets, are sent out.

In this way friends, have I been BAMBOOZLED!

Rafi

----- Original Message -----
From: "Karl Krelove" <karlkrelove@-----.net>
To: <klarinet@-----.org>
Sent: Sunday, March 19, 2006 2:52 PM
Subject: RE: [kl] Rossi quality flaw

> I may have missed an earlier post in this thread (although I have been
> following it), but the reference to Francois Kloc and Buffet USA just went
> over my head. Was Mr. Kloc or Buffet involved in the problem Bruce wrote
> about, or is this only a tangentially related reference?
>
> Also, I missed any post that said WWBW (or its representatives) behaved
> unethically - was WWBW actually contacted directly about this and refused
to
> help? From the posts that I've read, Bruce was concerned that their
reaction
> would be to make him return the clarinet to them at an expense of both
time
> and money and anticipating that response upset him. I may have missed one
in
> which WWBW actually told him they couldn't/wouldn't help him.
>
> Bruce has written that "I don't think Rossi, WWBW, or I could have been
able
> to detect the flaw in normal testing" and seems satisfied with recent
> progress on the issue. Was there an earlier post that described acts on
the
> parts of WWBW, Francois Kloc, Buffet or for that matter Louis Rossi that
> should be characterized as attempts to "bamboozle" Bruce?
>
> I'm very confused.
>
> Karl
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Rommel John Miller [mailto:rjmiller@-----.net]
> > Sent: Sunday, March 19, 2006 12:50 PM
> > To: klarinet@-----.org
> > Subject: Re: [kl] Rossi quality flaw
> >
> > I wish:
> > 1. WWBW were as ethical and Responsible as Mr. Rossi, and 2.
> > That Francois Kloc and Buffet USA would care more to see
> > that someone "bamboozled" by WWBW gets a fair deal.
> >
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> Klarinet is a service of Woodwind.Org, Inc. http://www.woodwind.org
>
>

-------------------------------------------------------------------
Klarinet is a service of Woodwind.Org, Inc. http://www.woodwind.org