Klarinet Archive - Posting 000266.txt from 2006/03

From: Joseph Wakeling <joseph.wakeling@-----.net>
Subj: Re: [kl] K622 orchestral parts
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 15:28:17 -0500

--------------enig714C1AF24021B7D08AD45DD3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

dnleeson wrote:
> But concluding on "the result of the best possible scholarly research t=
o reconstruct the composer's text" is an oxymoron. No one can demonstrat=
e that s/he has reconstructed the composer's text. What you have defined =
is a "smart edition," in which the editor says, "I've done the best I can=
=2E" There are lots of those around, but there is no way to establish th=
at this is what Mozart wrote in the first place.
> =20

Fair call. :-)

--------------enig714C1AF24021B7D08AD45DD3
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFEFx7KcjylL0sfzuERAtdeAJ9Q7N0h+p+9wLhcETiNR9zXjc9sZACdHhc4
1ACQwfDmP01ScmaJ77XiL3s=
=a0jn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--------------enig714C1AF24021B7D08AD45DD3--