Klarinet Archive - Posting 000017.txt from 2005/09

From: "Elisha R." <rodr0316@-----.com>
Subj: RE: [kl] RE: BRSO Auditions 2nd Clarinet Tenure Position...
Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2005 12:35:00 -0400

Gas here on Long Island is at $3.50 just for Regular. Guess I won't be
traveling anywhere for the Labor Day weekend.

-Elisha

>From: "Bryan Crumpler" <crumpletox@-----.com>
>Reply-To: klarinet@-----.org
>To: klarinet@-----.org
>Subject: [kl] RE: BRSO Auditions 2nd Clarinet Tenure Position...
>Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2005 09:32:53 -0400
>
>This is sad... I see a lot of people saying stuff to the effect of "They
>were told to get out, but they didn't... and it's their fault".
>
>The last report I heard was that the vast majority of people that stayed
>and did not evacuate did not have the means to evacuate. They were poor
>people with no cars or transportation to shelters (which ended up crumbling
>as well). So I can empathize. Louisiana in general has one of the largest
>homeless populations and poverty rates in the entire USA.
>
>And if Bush can do anything about it... the 90-120 something billion being
>used on pappy's sand-box war could better be rerouted towards cleaning up
>disasters at "home" such as this. I can't believe the had the nerve to put
>a plug in his speech asking US citizens to give cash as support!!!!
>
>Geeze... what are these politicians thinking? Give cash independently to
>support a national disaster beyond anyone's control, but use taxes to
>support a war whose dangers no US civilian will ever experience first hand
>in order to fight back for something the gov't *could have* controlled?
>
>How's everyone's gas, by the way? Charlotte is on empty... and the truckers
>aren't coming to refill until after Labor Day. I just spent 2.99 per gallon
>filling up a tank after driving around for 2 hours trying to find a gas
>station that actually had gas. And that's been considered low.
>
>B
>
>
>http://www.whosthatguy.com
>-------------------------------------------------
>My new CD Release MONOCHROME is now available for purchase at:
>www.whosthatguy.com
>-------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>
>----Original Message Follows----
>From: klarinet-digest-help@-----.org
>Reply-To: klarinet@-----.org
>To: klarinet@-----.org
>Subject: klarinet Digest 1 Sep 2005 09:01:03 -0000 Issue 6200
>Date: 1 Sep 2005 09:01:03 -0000
>
>klarinet Digest 1 Sep 2005 09:01:03 -0000 Issue 6200
>
>Topics (messages 84386 through 84404):
>
>Forgeries (was Orchetral sexism)
> 84386 by: Adam Michlin
> 84387 by: dnleeson
>
>BRSO Auditions 2nd Clarinet Tenure Position...
> 84388 by: Bryan Crumpler
> 84391 by: Karl Krelove
> 84393 by: Joseph Wakeling
> 84394 by: Gary Van Cott
> 84395 by: Dee Flint
> 84396 by: Joseph Wakeling
> 84399 by: Karl Krelove
> 84401 by: kevin fay
> 84402 by: Bill Hausmann
>
>The Cassation
> 84389 by: dnleeson
> 84400 by: kevin fay
>
>Re: Sinfonia Educational Foundation Director of Development
> 84390 by: Bryan Crumpler
>
>Re: Cassazione
> 84392 by: Oliver Seely
>
>New Orleans
> 84397 by: Fred
> 84398 by: Audrey Travis
>
>Hurricane in the Gulf
> 84403 by: Ormondtoby Montoya
> 84404 by: Ormondtoby Montoya
>
>Administrivia:
>
>To subscribe to the digest, e-mail:
> klarinet-digest-subscribe@-----.org
>
>
>To post to the list, e-mail:
> klarinet@-----.org
>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 17:11:58 -0400
>To: klarinet@-----.org
>From: Adam Michlin <amichlin@-----.com>
>Subject: Forgeries (was Orchetral sexism)
>Message-Id: <5.2.0.9.0.20050831165750.01c0dc28@-----.com>
>
>I am curious, the use of the word "forgery" has (to me, at least) the
>connotation of someone creating something to intentionally defraud (as in
>your book). Is this Quartet an attempt to defraud or just one of the many
>wishful thinking anonymous compositions?
>
>I would definitely attribute anything Southern Music Company did to
>ignorance before malice. Well, perhaps more appropriately apathy, they just
>don't seem to care to know the truth and, I suppose, this allows them to
>profit from passing on misinformation. I think this is different than
>forgery and would be interested to know if there is a true forgery in the
>history of this piece (and, alas, have no access to BBC4).
>
> -Adam
>
>PS: A rhetorical question, would you really want to be paid in British
>Pizzas? I guess it can't be much worse than what passes for pizza in
>California, though!
>
>At 07:53 AM 8/31/2005 -0700, dnleeson wrote:
> >For the British members of the klarinet list, I am going to be on
> >BBC in an interview about Mozart forgiers. It is not about my
> >book, but about real forgeries of compositions attributed to
> >Mozart. The show will be on BBC4 on either Oct. 20 at 11:30 am.
> >And one of the many works that I will indentify as a forgery is
> >the Cassation Quartet as published by Southern Music company of
> >San Antonio.
> >
> >Does BBC pay in pizzas?
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 14:51:09 -0700
>To: <klarinet@-----.org>
>From: "dnleeson" <dnleeson@-----.net>
>Subject: RE: [kl] Forgeries (was Orchetral sexism)
>Message-ID: <FJEKIMDEOJFJPBKBMDOPCEPMDKAA.dnleeson@-----.net>
>
>It is impossible for me to know Southern Music company's motive
>in selling the work as a Mozart composition. I don't think there
>is malice and, in any case, they are naive in their belief about
>the authority of the work. They are not in the business of
>authenticating allegations of authority and authorship. They
>believe what they are told.
>
>In 1936, Albert J. Andraud, English horn player with the
>Cincinnati SO, published this work under the title "Cassation" as
>"an original composition by Mozart discovered in 1906." I have
>no idea what went through Andraud's head, or where he got this
>quartet for clarinet, oboe, horn, and bassoon, or why it took
>from 1906 until 1936 to publish the work the "newly discovered
>work."
>
>He may not have been malicious either. But when you are a
>publisher and someone brings a work to you for publication, it is
>safe to say that your interest is much more peaked when the
>seller tells you it is a newly discovered Mozart composition.
>
>Whatever Andraud's motivation, that is what happened, and I
>cannot supply his state of mind, or where he got the piece, or
>anything.
>
>When Andrau died, Southern music bought his "Wind Instrument
>Music Library" and continued to publish it with one minor change.
>They authors are now said to be "Mozart/Andraud." I suppose that
>this means that Mozart wrote it and Andraud did something,
>perhaps edit it. There is no explanation in the publication.
>It's just there. It is kind of like a band arrangement of Brahms
>1 by Joe Schnutz. It will read "Brahms/Schnutz," though in the
>Cassation, there is not claim of this being an arrangements. It
>is said to be "an original composition."
>
>When the 6th edition of the Kochel catalog came out in the mid
>1960s, the work was briefly addressed and placed in an appendix
>reserved for doubtful and spurious compositions, where it is to
>this day. Its authenticity was dismissed with the statment,
>"This work has nothing to do with Mozart."
>
>I believe (but really don't know) that someone found a source for
>the composition and that is that.
>
>When in the late 1960s I wrote an article for the Instrumentalist
>about the 10 worst composiitons in the Clarinetist's repertoire,
>I included the Cassation Quartet, and made some very negative
>comments about it. I received an unfriendly letter from the
>President of Southern Music, which told me that the work had to
>be genuine Mozart because it had been recorded by wind players
>from the Philadelphia orchestra, namely Gigliotti, Mason Jones,
>John De Lancie, and Sol Schoenbach. This, in the opinion of the
>SMC President established the authenticity of the work beyond
>question because "these men would know if the composition was or
>was not by Mozart." (This is my recollection of what was written,
>not an exact quotation.)
>
>In effect, it was presumed that anything recorded by these men
>had to be authentic or else they would not record it. That's an
>interesting idea.
>
>I wrote back and told the president that if he presented any
>authoritative document supporting the authenticity of the work, I
>would publicly apologize for my remarks. But if he could not do
>this, then my comments stood.
>
>That was the end of that. I never heard from him again. But I
>use that work as an example of how things get into the Mozart
>repertoire, and despite hard evidence that speaks against their
>authenticity, they never get out.
>
>Dan Leeson
>DNLeeson@-----.net
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Adam Michlin [mailto:amichlin@-----.com]
>Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2005 2:12 PM
>To: klarinet@-----.org
>Subject: [kl] Forgeries (was Orchetral sexism)
>
>I am curious, the use of the word "forgery" has (to me, at least)
>the
>connotation of someone creating something to intentionally
>defraud (as in
>your book). Is this Quartet an attempt to defraud or just one of
>the many
>wishful thinking anonymous compositions?
>
>I would definitely attribute anything Southern Music Company did
>to
>ignorance before malice. Well, perhaps more appropriately apathy,
>they just
>don't seem to care to know the truth and, I suppose, this allows
>them to
>profit from passing on misinformation. I think this is different
>than
>forgery and would be interested to know if there is a true
>forgery in the
>history of this piece (and, alas, have no access to BBC4).
>
> -Adam
>
>PS: A rhetorical question, would you really want to be paid in
>British
>Pizzas? I guess it can't be much worse than what passes for pizza
>in
>California, though!
>
>At 07:53 AM 8/31/2005 -0700, dnleeson wrote:
> >For the British members of the klarinet list, I am going to be
>on
> >BBC in an interview about Mozart forgiers. It is not about my
> >book, but about real forgeries of compositions attributed to
> >Mozart. The show will be on BBC4 on either Oct. 20 at 11:30 am.
> >And one of the many works that I will indentify as a forgery is
> >the Cassation Quartet as published by Southern Music company of
> >San Antonio.
> >
> >Does BBC pay in pizzas?
>
>-----------------------------------------------------------------
>--
>Klarinet is a service of Woodwind.Org, Inc.
>http://www.woodwind.org
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 18:09:39 -0400
>To: klarinet@-----.org
>From: "Bryan Crumpler" <crumpletox@-----.com>
>Subject: BRSO Auditions 2nd Clarinet Tenure Position...
>Message-ID: <BAY103-F24B7187749A25A59582BCBDCA10@-----.gbl>
>
>I presume those auditions are canceled!?! I'll have to ask Mr. Muffitt...
>but my gosh, the aftermath on the news about New Orleans is ridiculous with
>all the looting and chaos.
>
>Bush sounded kinda corny with his public statement. I haven't been keeping
>up with his presidential remarks... but has he declared that an official
>disaster area yet? (okay smack me if he has)
>
>Hahaha
>
>Bry
>
>http://www.whosthatguy.com
>-------------------------------------------------
>My new CD Release MONOCHROME is now available for purchase at:
>www.whosthatguy.com
>-------------------------------------------------
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 19:03:10 -0400
>To: klarinet@-----.org
>From: Karl Krelove <karlkrelove@-----.net>
>Subject: Re: [kl] BRSO Auditions 2nd Clarinet Tenure Position...
>Message-ID: <4316372E.9040307@-----.net>
>
>I think he did the day before the storm hit. Louisiana and Mississippi.
>
>Bryan Crumpler wrote:
>
> > ... but has he declared that an official disaster area yet? (okay
> > smack me if he has)
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2005 00:48:50 +0100
>To: klarinet@-----.org
>From: Joseph Wakeling <joseph.wakeling@-----.net>
>Subject: Re: [kl] BRSO Auditions 2nd Clarinet Tenure Position...
>Message-ID: <431641E2.6040708@-----.net>
>
>Bryan Crumpler wrote:
>
> > Bush sounded kinda corny with his public statement. I haven't been
> > keeping up with his presidential remarks... but has he declared that
> > an official disaster area yet? (okay smack me if he has)
>
>You know, I'm not sure I give a shit about what Bush has said or not
>said. What bothers me rather more is the complete failure to effect a
>decent evacuation process for the city of New Orleans. Current news
>reports are suggesting that hundreds and probably thousands of people
>are dead. I cannot understand how a country with the wealth and power
>of the US, with the hurricane seen some time in advance, could have so
>failed its citizens. This was not a tsunami that arrived without warning.
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 16:55:57 -0700
>To: klarinet@-----.org
>From: Gary Van Cott <gary@-----.com>
>Subject: Re: [kl] BRSO Auditions 2nd Clarinet Tenure Position...
>Message-Id: <5.2.0.9.0.20050831165145.03fd47d0@-----.org>
>
>I hate to be off topic, but it does not appear that the local and state
>officials took this threat very seriously.
>
>It also appears that the measures designed to prevent the low lying city of
>New Orleans from flooding were completely inadequate.
>
>I don't believe that the locals will have to look very far to assign blame.
>
>Gary
>
> >You know, I'm not sure I give a shit about what Bush has said or not
> >said. What bothers me rather more is the complete failure to effect a
> >decent evacuation process for the city of New Orleans. Current news
> >reports are suggesting that hundreds and probably thousands of people are
> >dead. I cannot understand how a country with the wealth and power of the
> >US, with the hurricane seen some time in advance, could have so failed
>its
> >citizens. This was not a tsunami that arrived without warning.
> >
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 20:43:18 -0400
>To: <klarinet@-----.org>
>From: "Dee Flint" <deeflint01@-----.net>
>Subject: Re: [kl] BRSO Auditions 2nd Clarinet Tenure Position...
>Message-ID: <000a01c5ae8e$25dce5f0$6501a8c0@DeeFlint>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Joseph Wakeling" <joseph.wakeling@-----.net>
>To: <klarinet@-----.org>
>Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2005 7:48 PM
>Subject: Re: [kl] BRSO Auditions 2nd Clarinet Tenure Position...
>
> > Bryan Crumpler wrote:
> >
> >> Bush sounded kinda corny with his public statement. I haven't been
> >> keeping up with his presidential remarks... but has he declared that an
> >> official disaster area yet? (okay smack me if he has)
> >
> >
> > You know, I'm not sure I give a shit about what Bush has said or not
>said.
> > What bothers me rather more is the complete failure to effect a decent
> > evacuation process for the city of New Orleans. Current news reports
>are
> > suggesting that hundreds and probably thousands of people are dead. I
> > cannot understand how a country with the wealth and power of the US,
>with
> > the hurricane seen some time in advance, could have so failed its
> > citizens. This was not a tsunami that arrived without warning.
> >
> >
>
>They were all warned with plenty of time to evacuate and were advised to do
>so. Many chose not to and thought they could ride it out.
>
>Dee D. Flint, N8UZE
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2005 01:58:44 +0100
>To: klarinet@-----.org
>From: Joseph Wakeling <joseph.wakeling@-----.net>
>Subject: Re: [kl] BRSO Auditions 2nd Clarinet Tenure Position...
>Message-ID: <43165244.6060806@-----.net>
>
>Dee Flint wrote:
>
> > They were all warned with plenty of time to evacuate and were advised
> > to do so. Many chose not to and thought they could ride it out.
>
>Not good enough IMO. The authorities *have* to take direct
>responsibility for people's safety in a situation like this. It's not
>good enough to simply leave each private individual to do things for
>themselves. To what extent was there an official evacuation plan and
>facilities put in place to facilitate people leaving? To what extent
>was the city capable of dealing with eleventh-hour evacuations for
>people who changed their minds at the last minute? To what extent did
>the authorities recognise the seriousness of the threat enough to
>understand that in such circumstances it would be reasonable to
>*oblige*, rather than advise, people to evacuate?
>
>"Advising" just undersells the seriousness of the situation. I can't
>help but believe that in most first world countries people would have
>been told: You *must* get out now because if you don't there is a high
>chance you will end up dead. And adequate facilities would have been
>put in place to *make* that evacuation happen.
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 22:28:19 -0400
>To: klarinet@-----.org
>From: Karl Krelove <karlkrelove@-----.net>
>Subject: Re: [kl] BRSO Auditions 2nd Clarinet Tenure Position...
>Message-ID: <43166743.5050408@-----.net>
>
>It is worth considering that at least 12 - maybe as many as 18 - hours
>before the storm hit, tracking radar showed that the storm center was
>changing course such that it was going to pass east of New Orleans,
>which would have been hit with the weaker western side of the storm.
>And, indeed, that's exactly what happened. As of late Monday night all
>reports were that the city had missed taking the beating that had been
>feared a couple of days earlier. So, well before the "last minute" many
>people may have decided with some apparent reason that the danger didn't
>justify leaving after all, and the authorities would have had to spend a
>great deal of energy and man-hours finding these people in order to
>forcibly evacuate them, man-hours that it appeared were needed more to
>help those who were leaving. In fact, the flooding that now has
>destroyed so much of the city is the result of the failure and breach of
>two of the levees that contained Lake Pontchartrain and kept it from
>flooding the city, not of the actual wind and rain that had by that time
>passed the city by without flooding and mass destruction.
>
>The cities and beaches along the Mississippi coastline are another
>story, and the finger pointing there has already started.
>
>Karl Krelove
>
>Joseph Wakeling wrote:
>
> >
> > Not good enough IMO. The authorities *have* to take direct
> > responsibility for people's safety in a situation like this. It's not
> > good enough to simply leave each private individual to do things for
> > themselves. To what extent was there an official evacuation plan and
> > facilities put in place to facilitate people leaving? To what extent
> > was the city capable of dealing with eleventh-hour evacuations for
> > people who changed their minds at the last minute? To what extent did
> > the authorities recognise the seriousness of the threat enough to
> > understand that in such circumstances it would be reasonable to
> > *oblige*, rather than advise, people to evacuate?
> >
> > "Advising" just undersells the seriousness of the situation. I can't
> > help but believe that in most first world countries people would have
> > been told: You *must* get out now because if you don't there is a high
> > chance you will end up dead. And adequate facilities would have been
> > put in place to *make* that evacuation happen.
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 20:20:52 -0700
>To: <klarinet@-----.org>
>From: "kevin fay" <kevinfay@-----.com>
>Subject: RE: [kl] BRSO Auditions 2nd Clarinet Tenure Position...
>Message-ID: <BAY13-DAV6A034D9AC00814CE2901ECEA00@-----.gbl>
>
>Dee Flint wrote:
>
><<<[Folks in New Orleans] were all warned with plenty of time to evacuate
>and were advised to do so. Many chose not to and thought they could ride it
>out.>>>
>
> . . and Joseph Wakeling replied:
>
><<<Not good enough IMO. The authorities *have* to take direct
>responsibility for people's safety in a situation like this. It's not good
>enough to simply leave each private individual to do things for themselves.
>To what extent was there an official evacuation plan and facilities put in
>place to facilitate people leaving? To what extent was the city capable of
>dealing with eleventh-hour evacuations for people who changed their minds
>at
>the last minute? To what extent did the authorities recognise the
>seriousness of the threat enough to understand that in such circumstances
>it
>would be reasonable to *oblige*, rather than advise, people to evacuate?>>>
>
>Joseph - have you ever *been* to New Orleans? Folks down there have a bit
>of an independent streak. They were given *plenty* of notice that this was
>The Big One. Emergency plans for a Category 3 hurricane have been in place
>for decades. Unfortunately, this was a Category 5. (The wind force was
>less than that when it came ashore, but the storm surge was the largest in
>Louisianan history).
>
>I don't understand your use of the term "oblige." You can't "make" anyone
>leave their home if they do not choose to do so. It's a free country -
>people make their own decisions, often the wrong ones. They were told that
>if they didn't leave they were gonna die. Astonishingly, some dudes
>actually tried to *surf* in it - Darwin proven again.
>
>Others weren't stupid, just incapable of leaving because of health or other
>issues. There are only so many buses.
>
>The local government in New Orleans and parts thereabouts has the
>reputation
>of being somewhat corrupt and not particularly effective. Even the most
>effective government, however, won't change the geography. New Orleans is
>basically a bowl cut out of a swamp, most of the city several feet below
>sea
>level. It's surrounded by the largest river on the continent and a big
>lake. Levees (similar to the dikes in The Netherlands) are the only thing
>that keeps the land dry. (Well, damp).
>
>Most everyone who lives or has ever been to New Orleans knows about the
>water everywhere. There are no burials there, as the coffins would float
>up
>- all get cremated or above-ground mausoleums. There are no high-rises
>downtown, since the whole city is built on mud. Why anyone would live
>there
>is beyond me.
>
> . . except for the culture, the jazz, and the food of course.
>
>This was one heck of a storm. In Biloxi, entire casinos were carried over
>freeway overpasses and carefully placed on top of hotels. New Orleans is
>a
>much older, poorer city. I'm not sure that there's very much that could
>have been done.
>
>Let's hope this never happens to Amsterdam.
>
>kjf
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 22:24:00 -0500
>To: klarinet@-----.org
>From: Bill Hausmann <bhausmann1@-----.net>
>Subject: Re: [kl] BRSO Auditions 2nd Clarinet Tenure Position...
>Message-Id: <5.1.1.6.0.20050831222212.03bb7a10@-----.net>
>
>At 12:48 AM 9/1/2005 +0100, Joseph Wakeling wrote:
>You know, I'm not sure I give a sh*t about what Bush has said or not
>said. What bothers me rather more is the complete failure to effect a
>decent evacuation process for the city of New Orleans. Current news
>reports are suggesting that hundreds and probably thousands of people are
>dead. I cannot understand how a country with the wealth and power of the
>US, with the hurricane seen some time in advance, could have so failed its
>citizens. This was not a tsunami that arrived without warning.
>
>What would you have them do? Everyone was TOLD to leave the city, but many
>were too stubborn to do so. They are the ones suffering now.
>
>Bill Hausmann
>
>If you have to mic a saxophone, the rest of the band is TOO LOUD!
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 15:13:03 -0700
>To: "klarinet@-----.org>
>From: "dnleeson" <dnleeson@-----.net>
>Subject: The Cassation
>Message-ID: <FJEKIMDEOJFJPBKBMDOPMEPNDKAA.dnleeson@-----.net>
>
>Dave Ross of El Paso kindly sent me the following note.
>
>"The Cassation you mention is by Georg Lickl (1769-1843). I have
>a photocopy of the original title page, and Kurt Birsak published
>an article some years ago in one of the Mozarteum Yearbooks on
>the mis-attribution of this piece."
>
>I thank Dave for the information. It confirms what was
>established subjectively by the editors of the 6th edition of the
>Koechel catalog.
>
>You will note that I never said anything about the work itself.
>I am not qualified to state if a work is good or bad. So I have
>not said, "That awful work..." or "That heavenly composition..."
>
>It just isn't by Mozart and Albert J. Andraud has a lot of
>explaining to do when he gets done with the Sibelius Swan of
>Tuenola with the heavenly orchestra.
>
>Dan Leeson
>DNLeeson@-----.net
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 20:18:03 -0700
>To: <klarinet@-----.org>
>From: "kevin fay" <kevinfay@-----.com>
>Subject: RE: [kl] The Cassation
>Message-ID: <BAY13-DAV2BC4072D1DB412A5444E2CEA00@-----.gbl>
>
>Dan Lesson wrote of The Cassation:
>
><<<You will note that I never said anything about the work itself.
>I am not qualified to state if a work is good or bad. So I have
>not said, "That awful work..." or "That heavenly composition...">>>
>
> . . but you *did* list it in "the 10 worst compositions in the
>Clarinetist's repertoire" yes? I assume that "worst" means somewhat less
>than best, or even good? Excremental?
>
>Or did you mean "wurst" as in tasty?
>
>kjf
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 18:25:27 -0400
>To: klarinet@-----.org
>From: "Bryan Crumpler" <crumpletox@-----.com>
>Subject: Job: Sinfonia Educational Foundation Director of Development
>Message-ID: <BAY103-F138B1140FA74999CF14FADCA10@-----.gbl>
>
>I know some of you have to be Sinfonians... and hundreds of you probably
>aren't, but that's no matter. Being a brother of Phi Mu Alpha is not a
>requirement. Job description & further details are at:
>
>http://www.sinfonia.org/employment.asp
>
>Bryan
>
>http://www.whosthatguy.com
>-------------------------------------------------
>My new CD Release MONOCHROME is now available for purchase at:
>www.whosthatguy.com
>-------------------------------------------------
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 16:42:02 -0700
>To: klarinet@-----.org
>From: Oliver Seely <oseely@-----.edu>
>Subject: Re: Cassazione
>Message-Id: <6.2.3.4.0.20050831163015.01e01aa0@-----.edu>
>
>Following a convincing posting on this forum almost ten years ago I
>changed the composer of the Cassazione to Georg Lickl on my Web
>page. If anyone out there has a .gif or .jpg file showing the title
>page of this work I'd gladly include it where the link to the piece
>is offered.
>
>Oliver
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 21:19:33 -0400
>To: klarinet@-----.org
>From: Fred <fred.sheim@-----.net>
>Subject: New Orleans
>Message-id: <6.2.3.4.2.20050831211433.03ca5c88@-----.net>
>
>I attended the 2001 Clarinetfest in New Orleans and stayed at the
>Hilton New Orleans Riverside Hotel. I was on the fourth floor facing
>the river with nothing between me and the river but the narrow
>Riverside walk. Does anyone know if that hotel and the surrounding
>area (which had an aquarium, an Imax theater, and a "world trade
>center" complex, as well as a large casino (Harrah's?)) is under
>water? If I remember correctly, many of the houses north of the
>hotel were very old, frail, wooden structures.
>
>Fred
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 18:33:01 -0700
>To: klarinet@-----.org
>From: Audrey Travis <clr91nt@-----.ca>
>Subject: Re: [kl] New Orleans
>Message-id: <556F05EC-1A88-11DA-A7CD-000D933DB09C@-----.ca>
>
>News reports say that 80% of New Orleans is under water, so the chances
>are very good, though Canal Street, on early reports, wasn't too bad.
>I can't remember if those spots are near each other. I was there too.
>My prayers and hopes of safety go out to everyone in the devastated
>areas, especially in New Orleans and Biloxi which seem to be the worst
>of the devastated areas.
>
>Audrey
>On 31-Aug-05, at 6:19 PM, Fred wrote:
>
> > I attended the 2001 Clarinetfest in New Orleans and stayed at the
> > Hilton New Orleans Riverside Hotel. I was on the fourth floor facing
> > the river with nothing between me and the river but the narrow
> > Riverside walk. Does anyone know if that hotel and the surrounding
> > area (which had an aquarium, an Imax theater, and a "world trade
> > center" complex, as well as a large casino (Harrah's?)) is under
> > water? If I remember correctly, many of the houses north of the hotel
> > were very old, frail, wooden structures.
> >
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 20:35:28 -0700
>To: klarinet@-----.org
>From: ormo2ndtoby@-----.net (Ormondtoby Montoya)
>Subject: Hurricane in the Gulf
>Message-ID: <22434-43167700-1127@-----.net>
>
>As someone who has a relative over whom the storm's eye passed, and from
>whom nobody has heard since, I have to agree that:
>
>(a) many people were foolish not to evacuate when they had the physical
>and economic ability to do so
>
>(b) the government agencies haven't done their job either.
>
>IMO, the fault is shared by each person and agency, including those who
>have talked for years about improving the levies but have not done so
>because of the admittedly high cost. But if you choose to live in an
>area where the danger is obvious....
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 20:41:16 -0700
>To: klarinet@-----.org
>From: ormo2ndtoby@-----.net (Ormondtoby Montoya)
>Subject: Re: [kl] Hurricane in the Gulf
>Message-ID: <22444-4316785C-75@-----.net>
>
>levies .... levees
>
>------------------------------
>
>End of klarinet Digest
>***********************************
>
>
>
>-------------------------------------------------------------------
>Klarinet is a service of Woodwind.Org, Inc. http://www.woodwind.org
>

-------------------------------------------------------------------
Klarinet is a service of Woodwind.Org, Inc. http://www.woodwind.org