Klarinet Archive - Posting 000328.txt from 2005/05
From: "Matthew Lloyd" <matthew@-----.uk> Subj: [kl] David Hume - "Is" and "Ought" - "On the Standard of Taste" Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 17:50:52 -0400
I did quite a lot of work at University on David Hume and "Is" and
"Ought" - relating to his essay "On the Standard of Taste".
I reluctantly came to the conclusion that there is no absolute.
But outside the context of Philosophy, I find the suggestion that
identifying the greater of Mozart or Wham! is simply a question of
personal taste deeply inadequate.
Matthew
-----Original Message-----
From: Ormondtoby Montoya [mailto:ormo2ndtoby@-----.net]=20
Sent: 24 May 2005 22:21
To: klarinet@-----.org
Subject: RE: [kl] Wagner!
Matthew=A0Lloyd wrote:
> There is plenty to demonstrate technical
> ability. But that's not what makes Mozart
> supreme over all artists. I guess it is what
> we'd think of an article of faith.
Perhaps "includes specific details" is a better basis for evaluating a
criticism than "factual" is.
For example, you can praise a composer for emphasizing (or not
emphasizing) tonicity. However, while it may be a 'fact' that a
certain composer did (or did not) do so, it remains a value judgement
whether tonicity makes 'better music' or 'worse music' or neither.
Ultimately any musical criticism can be condemned as "opinion" or
'personal preference'.
Perhaps the only "fact" about a particular piece of music is how many
people did (or did not) state that they preferred it. In this sense,
it was a "factual" statement to say that many people enjoy "Ride of the
Valkyrie". Whether Valkyrie is also good music is based on opinion and
preference, not on 'fact'.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Klarinet is a service of Woodwind.Org, Inc. http://www.woodwind.org
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Klarinet is a service of Woodwind.Org, Inc. http://www.woodwind.org
|
|
|