Klarinet Archive - Posting 000323.txt from 2005/05
From: "Matthew Lloyd" <matthew@-----.uk> Subj: RE: [kl] Wagner! Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 16:44:58 -0400
There is plenty to demonstrate technical ability.
But that's not what makes Mozart supreme over all artists.
I guess it is what we'd think of an article of faith.
Matthew
-----Original Message-----
From: Ormondtoby Montoya [mailto:ormo2ndtoby@-----.net]
Sent: 24 May 2005 21:37
To: klarinet@-----.org
Subject: RE: [kl] Wagner!
> offer what reads like a factual argument
> based on opinion [snip] what you have
> offered here is not a useful argument.
Dan, you must know by now that I enjoy Mozart's music. Therefore what
follows is not a criticism against Mozart.
Although it is difficult to claim that Mozart was not a brilliant
composer, is there any 'factual' argument that can be used to praise
him?
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Klarinet is a service of Woodwind.Org, Inc. http://www.woodwind.org
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Klarinet is a service of Woodwind.Org, Inc. http://www.woodwind.org
|
|
|