Klarinet Archive - Posting 000223.txt from 2005/04

From: "Dan Leeson" <dnleeson@-----.net>
Subj: RE: [kl] Test Results
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 18:49:49 -0400

You missed my point. How can he argue that one of the hypotheses is flawed
while putting forward one equally flawed?

-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Flavel [mailto:tom@-----.net]On Behalf Of Tom Flavel
Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 3:15 PM
To: klarinet@-----.org
Subject: Re: [kl] Test Results

On 12/04/2005 15:09:06, Dan Leeson wrote:
> How can you possibly say that the test was a long distance from good
science
> when the argument offered was that it was possible to tell the geography
of
> the player by the sound? Now THAT opinion is really bad science.

This is false dichotomy: A poorly-founded argument does not require a
poorly-founded test to proove or disprove it.

--
Tom

-------------------------------------------------------------------
Klarinet is a service of Woodwind.Org, Inc. http://www.woodwind.org

-------------------------------------------------------------------
Klarinet is a service of Woodwind.Org, Inc. http://www.woodwind.org