Klarinet Archive - Posting 000068.txt from 2005/02

From: Joseph Wakeling <joseph.wakeling@-----.net>
Subj: Re: [kl] Another mistake in K. 622???
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2005 17:00:17 -0500

dnleeson wrote:

> Notwithstanding the absence of the notation elsewhere, I'm going with
> this because the evidence is quit persuasive, though one can always be
> wrong about this sort of thing. In fact, I am writing up a technical
> paper on it now. That's not something I can do rapidly. It will take a
> month to get everthing right. I even found a translation error in the
> famous letter from Constanze about the stolen portmanteau of Stadler.

Dan, admit it. You actually have the portmanteau too and everything in
it. You're just keeping it quiet so as not to hit the sales of your
book, aren't you? ;-)

-- Joe

+------------------------------------------------------------+
| Jan 31 10:25:22 EST 2005 - end of day 10 - 103 donors |
| The 2005 Woodwind.Org Donation Drive is Underway. |
| Please visit http://secure.donax-us.com/donation for more |
| information. Help Keep the List Going! |
+------------------------------------------------------------+
Klarinet is a service of Woodwind.Org, Inc. http://www.woodwind.org
Sat Jan 29 11:56:46 EST 2005