Klarinet Archive - Posting 000048.txt from 2005/02

From: Tim Roberts <timr@-----.com>
Subj: RE: [kl] Another mistake in K. 622???
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2005 13:58:19 -0500

On Wed, 2 Feb 2005 14:55:05 -0800, "dnleeson" <dnleeson@-----.net>
wrote:

>You and Tony may be right about the lack of dots on the violin
>part. I'll have to check it again when I have time. But I was
>so amazed at the dots on the basset horn part and the implication
>of that abbreviation that I went ga-ga for about 10 minutes. I
>may write something about that for The Clarinet. Some might
>think it a small thing, but I think it is hot doo-doo. To find a
>possible error in 622 at the juncture of history is non trivial.
>

Is there a precedent in Mozart's other autographs for this notation?

One of the key things I have learned from your posts, Dan, is that we
should be skeptical of interpretations that are not consistent with the
composer's established patterns.
--
- Tim Roberts, timr@-----.com
Providenza & Boekelheide, Inc.

+------------------------------------------------------------+
| Jan 31 10:25:22 EST 2005 - end of day 10 - 103 donors |
| The 2005 Woodwind.Org Donation Drive is Underway. |
| Please visit http://secure.donax-us.com/donation for more |
| information. Help Keep the List Going! |
+------------------------------------------------------------+
Klarinet is a service of Woodwind.Org, Inc. http://www.woodwind.org
Sat Jan 29 11:56:46 EST 2005