Klarinet Archive - Posting 000137.txt from 2005/01

From: "dnleeson" <dnleeson@-----.net>
Subj: RE: [kl] RE: Klocker
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 08:58:57 -0500

Well, I am not sure why speculating about his intentions for not
request cadenzas would be of value. I speculated on one and was
quite incorrect. What is most important is that there are no
cadenzas. What is there is something else, and contemporary
clarinetists are not comfortable with this 18th century custom of
improvising a lead in.

It has come to the point of using the Eingang for K. 581 in the
absence of any good ideas of what else to do. While the idea is
not a bad one, it is an overworked solution to the problem.

Dan Leeson
DNLeeson@-----.net

-----Original Message-----
From: Adam Michlin [mailto:amichlin@-----.com]
Sent: Monday, January 10, 2005 10:13 PM
To: klarinet@-----.org
Subject: RE: [kl] RE: Klocker

At 12:22 PM 1/10/2005 -0800, dnleeson wrote:
>True. I may have overstated the case. But that still does not
>change the fact that 622 has no cadenzas even if my answer why
>not is unstable.

Do you have any other thoughts as to why 622 does not contain a
cadenza?

-Adam

-----------------------------------------------------------------
----
Klarinet is a service of Woodwind.Org, Inc.
http://www.woodwind.org

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Klarinet is a service of Woodwind.Org, Inc. http://www.woodwind.org