Klarinet Archive - Posting 000105.txt from 2005/01

From: Adam Michlin <amichlin@-----.com>
Subj: RE: [kl] RE: Klocker
Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2005 21:51:21 -0500

Dan,

At 12:53 PM 1/8/2005 -0800, dnleeson wrote:
>And one of the reasons why 622 does not have a cadenza is
>because, unlike the piano and violin, it's hard to make
>interesting harmonies on a clarinet (though today with what a
>clarinetist can do with harmonics, that would be an interesting
>challenge).

How would this account for the honest to goodness, tonic in second
inversion, cadenzas in the first movements of the earlier wind concertos
such as K.191, K.299, K.313, and K.314? Additionally, many J.C. Bach wind
concertos (for bassoon and flute, at least) of around the same time also
seem to contain such cadenzas.

Or am I missing something?

-Adam

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Klarinet is a service of Woodwind.Org, Inc. http://www.woodwind.org