Klarinet Archive - Posting 000090.txt from 2005/01

From: "pwHarris1" <pwharris1@-----.net>
Subj: Re: [kl] RE: Klocker
Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2005 14:28:12 -0500


----- Original Message -----
From: "pwHarris1" <pwharris1@-----.net>
To: <klarinet@-----.org>
Sent: Saturday, January 08, 2005 1:25 PM
Subject: Re: [kl] RE: Klocker

> Well it is to bad. When you stick to your guns and tell the world not to
> play a cadenza in the piece, your are dismissing some very beautiful
> writing, some short and some way to long by performers playing the piece,
> starting(I am sure there are earlier examples) with Carl Baermann through
> wonderful contemporary players such as Tony Pay and David Schiffren among
> many who put a cadenza in this particular place and ornament the work
> profusely.--
>
> - Original Message -----
> From: "dnleeson" <dnleeson@-----.net>
> To: <klarinet@-----.org>
> Sent: Saturday, January 08, 2005 9:57 AM
> Subject: RE: [kl] RE: Klocker
>
>>
>> None of this history has anything to do with the presence or
>> absence of the cadenza, but I thought you should know generally
>> what happened to the work and why there is a question of the
>> authority of what is played today. But there is no question that
>> the work as we know it HAS NO CADENZAS in it.
>>
>> Dan Leeson
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Klarinet is a service of Woodwind.Org, Inc. http://www.woodwind.org