Klarinet Archive - Posting 000068.txt from 2005/01 
From: "dnleeson" <dnleeson@-----.net> Subj: RE: [kl] Leeson Date: Fri,  7 Jan 2005 22:42:48 -0500
  I've got to admit that I don't know what you are saying.  Exactly 
to what are you objecting? 
 
Insofar as your comments about Mozart, it is not that he found 
figures that sounded good.  It was what he did with the figures 
he had available to him that made them sound good.  Whatever 
figures he used are traditional 18th century musical oratory used 
by 100 other composers, but he did something with them that 
elevated them to another level. In fact, in examining how 
Sussmayr wrote, for example, it turns out that the two men 
favored the same intervals and cliches almost all the time.  It's 
like two chefs who buy the same ingredients, as you would expect. 
But one makes a nice lunch, and the other makes a masterpiece. 
 
As for his not writing music for clarinet until he found players 
capable of playing them, I point out that he was writing clarinet 
music in his early teens. The "Concerto ossia Divertimento," K. 
113, with two effective clarinet parts was written when he was 
15. The fact that he did not use clarinets even more was not 
because he did not have great players available to him, but 
rather that he had NO players available to him, at least not in 
Salzburg as is believed to be the case.  Not until he got to 
Mannheim did he have an opportunity to write for them. 
 
As for his not writing music for instruments of limited capacity 
(such as the trumpets and trombones you cite), he wrote 15 non 
Requiem masses in Salzburg with trombones and trumptets in more 
than half of them. 
 
I guess I am grappling to find out what it is to which you are 
objecting.  What book?  What section? What page. 
 
Allen, if I jumped on you and said, "That was a terrible 
operation you performed," you might be a little taken aback 
because of a lack of identification of which operation and when, 
and what are the precise details of whatever it is I am objecting 
to. 
 
Could you clarify, please.  I don't know which way to turn right 
now. 
 
Please sit down more calmly, and tell me what it is that you find 
troubling.  I can't figure it out from you note. 
 
Dan Leeson 
DNLeeson@-----.net 
 
-----Original Message----- 
From: Allen Levin [mailto:alevin@-----.net] 
Sent: Friday, January 07, 2005 1:38 PM 
To: klarinet@-----.org 
Subject: RE: [kl] Leeson 
 
I'm now up to page 100.  I find the argument about style 
persuasive; but 
not complete. 
 
A composer's vocabulary derives from many sources.  Some may be 
as simple 
as figures he/she finds easy to play or sing.  Others may derive 
from the 
limitations of the available instruments.  Much of Mozart's 
idiomatic 
vocabulary of figures (particularly scale figures) seems (in my 
opinion) to 
derive from both the virtues and limitations of the clavichords 
and early 
forte-pianos.  He had a knack for finding figures that sounded 
good.  He 
didn't get into much writing for the clarinet until there were 
performers 
who had the technique necessary to play them.  (Except for the 
music for 
glass harmonica, it doesn't seem that he wrote a lot of exposed 
music for 
instruments of limited capacity - like the trumpet and trombone - 
unless he 
tailored the music idiomatically to those instruments.)  If the 
Stadler 
brothers had appeared a few years earlier there might have been 
even more 
music for the clarinet family. 
 
Anyone with an ear and half a brain will - consciously or 
otherwise - adopt 
the idiomatic vocabulary of the original composer.  The result 
may not be 
perfection; but it will be recognizable.  Remember the Haydn 
"Mozart" 
quartets and the Mozart "Haydn" quartets?  Imitation was truly 
the most 
sincere form of flattery - and evidence that the imitator was a 
master of 
the compositional craft.  In the instance of the Requiem, it 
wasn't 
publicly recognized  flattery - and that must have driven 
Sussmeyr to 
distraction as the years passed.  In the beginning, the widow 
coudn't 
afford to have it public.  Later on her need was to protect and 
enhance her 
husband's reputation. 
 
----------------------------------------------------------------- 
---- 
Klarinet is a service of Woodwind.Org, Inc. 
http://www.woodwind.org 
 
--------------------------------------------------------------------- 
Klarinet is a service of Woodwind.Org, Inc. http://www.woodwind.org 
 
 
 | 
  | 
  |