Klarinet Archive - Posting 000059.txt from 2005/01

From: "pwHarris1" <pwharris1@-----.net>
Subj: Fw: [kl] RE: Klocker
Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 22:01:34 -0500


----- Original Message -----
From: "pwHarris1" <pwharris1@-----.net>
To: <klarinet@-----.org>
Sent: Friday, January 07, 2005 8:15 PM
Subject: Re: [kl] RE: Klocker

>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "dnleeson" <dnleeson@-----.net>
> To: <klarinet@-----.org>
> Sent: Friday, December 31, 2004 8:54 AM
> Subject: [kl] RE: Klocker doing too many cadenzas
>
>>
>> It is precisely the absence of this mechanism in the several
>> places of the clarinet concerto (two in the first movement and
>> one in the second) that demonstrate the COMPLETE ABSENCE of
>> cadenzas in K. 622. And this is the case despite the fact that a
>> large body of intelligent and mature clarinet players keep asking
>> "Which cadenza shall I use for K. 622?" And when one responds,
>> "There aren't any cadenzas in K. 622," they look at you as if you
>> had said "xtawplgh awelh jvqwv slvm."
>>>
>>
> Dan Leeson
>
In view of the fact that the first published example of K622 was an
arrangement 10 years after the authors death and that there is no autograph
or original of the work in existence, how can you be sure that there is no
call for cadenza especially in the Adagio about measure 59 where in several
of my scores a fermata does exist. Is it possibly that the cord is not
right even though we know that this is at least an arrangement at the very
best.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Klarinet is a service of Woodwind.Org, Inc. http://www.woodwind.org