Klarinet Archive - Posting 000414.txt from 2004/11

From: kimi <kimi_kimy@-----.com>
Subj: Re: [kl] Clarinets - Identification markings ect.,
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 20:06:41 -0500


--- Adam Michlin <amichlin@-----.com> wrote:

> At 12:24 AM 11/11/2004 +0100, Tony Pay wrote:
> >On 11 Nov, kimi <kimi_kimy@-----.com> wrote:
> > > I just wish this hadn't turned into some kind of
> debate. Kathy
> >
> >I can't see why you wish this. It's not a simple
> issue, and of course it's
> >not productive to appreciate only the people who
> support and agree with what
> >you initially think or do.
> >
> >Otherwise, you never learn anything new, and can
> never correct anything.
>
> I can see why she might wish this when the purpose
> of the debate becomes
> something other than to illuminate.
>
> I'll rest my case here, lest we spend another 20
> emails arguing back and
> forth enlarging our egos while simultaneously
> discouraging other people
> from posting for fear of wrath brought upon them or
> fear of causing us to
> spin into yet another debate. Feel free to have the
> last word.
>
> -Adam

I never said there was anything really wrong with a
debate, what bothered me is that it seemed like it was
becomin more than just a debate based on the
words/context some things were being used. That is
why the comment about not wishing it to be a debate.

And Adam you are right, it does become discouraging if
things go in a direction that seems more negative than
positive in the process. I just didn't want people
argueing over this thas all.
Thanks again
K

http://mail.yahoo.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Klarinet is a service of Woodwind.Org, Inc. http://www.woodwind.org