Klarinet Archive - Posting 000980.txt from 2004/10
From: "dnleeson" <dnleeson@-----.net> Subj: RE: [kl] Appealing to the superficial Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2004 17:48:01 -0500
You are working apples and oranges. Military bands require
uniformity of instrumentation. They serve a specific military
purpose and generally do not serve as a cultural organization
that can afford to be more investigative. So a standard
instrumentation for navy bands is very sensible.
Dan Leeson
DNLeeson@-----.net
-----Original Message-----
From: Patricia A. Smith [mailto:arlyss1@-----.net]
Sent: Sunday, October 31, 2004 2:26 PM
To: klarinet@-----.org
Subject: Re: [kl] Appealing to the superficial
Dan Leeson wrote:
>The band doesn't have to have saxophones. There aren't any in
the
>Mendelssohn Overture for Band (though there is a basset horn
>part). So the fact that there are no saxes in the Wellington's
>Victory fugue is nothing special.
>
>
Ooh, I wish someone had told whoever did the original
instrumentation
design for Navy bands THIS! Talk about a huge improvement over
what I
recall coping with for nearly fourteen years worth of ceremonial
band work:
Three or four trumpets, Two alto saxophones, two tenor
saxophones, two
or three trombones, one euphonium (if we were lucky) one tuba, a
snare
drum, a bass drum, one piccolo, three clarinets....
I'm completely serious.
Patricia Smith
-----------------------------------------------------------------
----
Klarinet is a service of Woodwind.Org, Inc.
http://www.woodwind.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Klarinet is a service of Woodwind.Org, Inc. http://www.woodwind.org
|
|
|