Klarinet Archive - Posting 000071.txt from 2004/10
From: "dnleeson" <dnleeson@-----.net> Subj: RE: [kl] Rossini Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2004 20:13:37 -0400
I too would like to see the reasons behind your conclusions. I
have no axe to grind on this piece, but the subject of determing
authenticity or lack of it is one in which I am vitally
interested.
In effect, I am more interested in your methodology for
establishing non-authorship by Rossini than in the piece itself.
Dan Leeson
DNLeeson@-----.net
-----Original Message-----
From: bflat [mailto:bflat@-----.it]
Sent: Monday, October 04, 2004 3:45 PM
To: klarinet@-----.org
Subject: Re: [kl] Rossini
Yes Michael.
Please show me your theory.
I'll be so glad to know your reasons.
paolo ravaglia
clarinet teacher
Conservatorio of Bologna
Italy
www.paoloravaglia.it
www.alteregogroup.it
>
> Lately, the subject of Mozart forgeries seems to have been
very
> popular. During my undergraduate work, I studied a piece that
is
> currently thought to be Rossini's. It is called *Introduction,
Theme,
> and Variations*. My search was quite exhaustive (even searching
> through the klarinet archives), and the conclusion of my thesis
is
> this piece is not by Rossini.
> Are any of you familiar with this piece? Do you think
it is
> by Rossini? Would you like to see my research?
>
>
> Michael Quirk
>
-----------------------------------------------------------------
----
Klarinet is a service of Woodwind.Org, Inc.
http://www.woodwind.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Klarinet is a service of Woodwind.Org, Inc. http://www.woodwind.org
|
|
|