Klarinet Archive - Posting 000150.txt from 2004/09

From: Roger Shilcock <roger.shilcock@-----.uk>
Subj: Re: [kl] C Clarinet or not?
Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2004 03:49:17 -0400

What you say somply makes the case for *both* parts. The C version may
well lie better on the instrument - in terms of fingering and and of the
overall pattern of sound.
Roger S.

In message <1d3.2a9002f9.2e70c187@-----.org writes:
> I guess my thought was that the majority of people would want a transposed
> part and it would seem to be a waste of time and money to include a C part as
> the "standard" part if it was rarely used.
>
> Also, if a non clarinetist (flutist, oboist, hornist, pianists, etc.) buys my
> editions they will have no clue about the C vs. Bb clarinet issue and would
> bring music to a rehearsal that would most likely be unplayable by the
> clarinetists.
>
> -Marc
>
>
> In a message dated 9/8/04 3:20:02 PM, charette@-----.org writes:
>
> << > Why not include the C version, and charge extra for the Bb?
>
>
> Which is what Luck's Music does for transposed parts ... >>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Klarinet is a service of Woodwind.Org, Inc. http://www.woodwind.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Klarinet is a service of Woodwind.Org, Inc. http://www.woodwind.org