Klarinet Archive - Posting 000128.txt from 2004/05

From: "Dan Leeson" <dnleeson@-----.net>
Subj: RE: [kl] What's wrong with using "dark" or "bright" to describe tone quality?
Date: Thu, 6 May 2004 18:33:20 -0400

Oh Andy, you are about 5 years out of synch. Take a look in the
klarinet archives that deal with the discussion of dark and
bright sounds. I couldn't possibly go through this again.
Alternatively, I have a piece called "That Nice Dark Sound"
somewhere in the archives. Work hard. Look it up. Read it.

Dan Leeson
DNLeeson@-----.net

-----Original Message-----
From: Andy Raibeck [mailto:klari_1@-----.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2004 3:01 PM
To: klarinet@-----.org
Subject: [kl] What's wrong with using "dark" or "bright" to
describe
tone quality?

I hear the word "color" ("colour" for our friends across the
Atlantic :-) used
to describe different ways of sounding/voicing/playing the same
note. "Dark"
and "bright" are certainly qualifiers used to describe color.
So... why frown
on the use of "dark" or "bright" in describing tone?

Regards,

Andy

http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/careermakeover

-----------------------------------------------------------------
----
Klarinet is a service of Woodwind.Org, Inc.
http://www.woodwind.org

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Klarinet is a service of Woodwind.Org, Inc. http://www.woodwind.org