Klarinet Archive - Posting 000556.txt from 2004/03

From: Nancy Buckman <eefer@------.net>
Subj: Re: [kl] "Biologically Correct" ?? (With relevance to
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2004 20:48:30 -0500

At 06:59 PM 3/9/2004, you wrote:

>What is purely biologically correct is the use of sexual reproductive
>organs to engage in behavior which leads to sexual reproduction

This is hogwash! The human body is covered in skin to protect the inner
organs from damage, help provide a place for your sweat to lay while you
cool off, hold the hair on your body so it can alert you that some sort of
matter is too close and to keep you warm. Are you going to ditch your
clothes because they aren't biologically correct? The naked body is
supposed to be thought of as beautiful to look at, but I don't think you
run around naked. And don't wash again and remove that dried sweat after
you cool off. The aroma was meant to announce to the nearest female that
you are in close proximity. Oh, and no more shaving because the hair on
your face wasn't meant to be cut off. I suppose you are also going to have
to decide whether to ever pee again because the male of the species does
two things with his genitalia and only reproduction is the biologically
correct use of the organs. Do you see how silly you sound? I think you
will have to sign off this list because you aren't using your senses in the
biologically correct way when you participate in list discussions. Your
hands aren't meant to type and your brain isn't supposed to be developed
enough to comprehend what this is all about.

Nancy

Nancy Buckman
Principal Clarinet / Orchestra AACC
eefer@------.net