Klarinet Archive - Posting 000602.txt from 2003/10
From: "Peter Flint Jr." <peterflint@-----.com> Subj: [kl] Re: who speaks Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2003 10:27:24 -0400
RE: lots of discussion on composers and performers take on pieces...
As composer who is returning to playing clarinet after a 10 year
hiatus, I should perhaps offer my two cents here.
There are definintely composers out there who like to think they can
control every facet of a performance of their pieces. We've probably
all seen such scores with the clouds of markings around the notes.
Personally, I like to specify the elements that are most crucial to
me and then leave the performer a certain amount of latitude to bring
their own personality and skills to bear on the work. I find I'm
always pleasantly surprised and I often get good results that I
wouldn't have come up with on my own. It does take a performer with
a certain degree of motivation and willingness to interpret.
Interestingly, I've found performers who are quite willing to
interpret old scores by long dead composers, but who then freeze up
with a living composer in the room and who expect us to provide all
the answers. I much prefer it when someone takes a risk and goes out
on a limb rather than sticking to the "safer" middle of the road
performance.
>Yes. What I dislike is the view that the composer has THE magical or
>mystical answer to the secret of the performance of their work. I used to
>feel they did. Maybe some do. Mostly they rely on the performer to put in
>his best effort to learn and present their work. They listen and learn and
>decide what direction they will take in subsequent compositions. [gross
>generalization].
Thankfully, I think we're moving away from the era of the omniscient
composer and the obedient performer. I'm quite happy to see a little
more sass from the performer and a little more humility from the
composers.
Peter Flint
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Klarinet is a service of Woodwind.Org, Inc. http://www.woodwind.org
|
|
|