Klarinet Archive - Posting 001160.txt from 2003/06

From: "Anthony Wakefield" <tony-w@-----.uk>
Subj: Re: [kl] The Stravinsky chord
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2003 04:29:44 -0400

From: "Tony Pay" <Tony@-----.uk>
Subject: Re: [kl] The Stravinsky chord

> The burden of my post was firstly that I find it surprising that such an
> extraordinary event as the inclusion of a piano chord in the Stravinsky
> 3 pieces should escape passing mention by someone commenting here about
> the disc. And secondly, that I find it absolutely incredible that it
> should escape passing mention by *everyone* commenting here about the
> disc.

Tony,
But the original posting did not involve, and was not concerned with
criticising the CD. The first post, by "noname" was a criticism of me,
accusing me of speaking for the rest of the list. There has not been any
side tracking to evaluate what the playing, recording quality, and/or
production is like on the disc itself.
I`m sure many of who received this disc have observed this piano entry - I
know of one who noticed it upon first playing two years ago. Why should it
be mentioned when the subject line was more political than musical?
Tony W.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Klarinet is supported by Woodwind.Org, http://www.woodwind.org/