Klarinet Archive - Posting 000210.txt from 2003/06
From: "Matthew Lloyd" <Matthew@-----.uk> Subj: RE: [kl] Word meaning & copyright? Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2003 02:00:38 -0400
Because it will sell well.
I think the official argument is that it is a literal reduction without
editing. I have a copy bought for the clarinet part - I accept that the
piano accompaniment is wholly wrong but is there for mere convenience or
rehearsal.
Matthew
-----Original Message-----
From: James Hobby [mailto:jhobby@-----.net]
Subject: Re: [kl] Word meaning & copyright?
Interesting. Urtext is pretty much what I thought it was. HOWEVER: I
followed the link that you provided, and then fuddled through some of
the
Peters Urtext editions. Given the status of the Mozart K622, how can
Peters
publish a Urtext edition of the Mozart Clarinet Concerto for A clarinet
WITH
PIANO ACCOMPANIMENT?!? Explanations, anyone?
Jim Hobby
>From: "Joseph H. Fasel" <jhf@-----.gov>
>
>Google turned up this page from Peters about urtext editions:
>
>http://www.edition-peters.com/urtext/urtext_text.html
This Email has been scanned for viruses, courtesy of Tnets.net
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Klarinet is supported by Woodwind.Org, http://www.woodwind.org/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Klarinet is supported by Woodwind.Org, http://www.woodwind.org/
|
|
|