Klarinet Archive - Posting 000685.txt from 2003/04
From: "Matthew Lloyd" <Matthew@-----.uk> Subj: RE: [kl] Why Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2003 00:40:21 -0400
The "accompaniment" is part of it - the work is incomplete with any part
missing.
It is Mozart - not some study!
Matthew
-----Original Message-----
From: Avrahm Galper [mailto:agalper@-----.com]
Subject: [kl] Why
Why don't listers comment on the actual notes of 622 rather than on the
accompaniment? Abe Galper
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Klarinet is supported by Woodwind.Org, http://www.woodwind.org/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Klarinet is supported by Woodwind.Org, http://www.woodwind.org/
|