Klarinet Archive - Posting 000685.txt from 2003/04

From: "Matthew Lloyd" <Matthew@-----.uk>
Subj: RE: [kl] Why
Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2003 00:40:21 -0400

The "accompaniment" is part of it - the work is incomplete with any part
missing.

It is Mozart - not some study!

Matthew

-----Original Message-----
From: Avrahm Galper [mailto:agalper@-----.com]
Subject: [kl] Why

Why don't listers comment on the actual notes of 622 rather than on the
accompaniment? Abe Galper

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Klarinet is supported by Woodwind.Org, http://www.woodwind.org/

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Klarinet is supported by Woodwind.Org, http://www.woodwind.org/

   
     Copyright © Woodwind.Org, Inc. All Rights Reserved    Privacy Policy    Contact charette@woodwind.org