Klarinet Archive - Posting 000210.txt from 2003/02

From: "fred.sheim" <fred.sheim@-----.net>
Subj: Re: [kl] Castelnuovo-Tedesco Question
Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2003 20:54:43 -0500

I would have a tendency to go with this explanation, since it does come
from the original score. The only caveat here would be if when the
composer arrived at the second recap of these measures he felt that the
c#'s improved them, and then neglected to correct the c#'s in the
beginning. So back to square one!

Fred

At 01:30 PM 2/7/03, you wrote:
>On Tue, 04 Feb 2003 16:25:53 -0600, klarinetteman@-----.com said:
>
> > Play C naturals in measure 3 and 4!!!! Dr. Gillespie at UNT got a
> > copy of the manuscript and C natural is written in the composers own
> > hand. That is why you will hear a C natural played on Bob Waltzel's
> > wonderful recording of the piece.
>
>Interesting. Does that apply when the bars recur later? (I suppose it
>must.)
>
>Why is C# printed, on both occasions, then? Did James Gillespie (yes?)
>give any explanation of that? And, where did you find the information?
>
>Tony
>--
>_________ Tony Pay
> |ony:-) 79 Southmoor Rd Tony@-----.uk
> | |ay Oxford OX2 6RE http://classicalplus.gmn.com/artists
> tel/fax 01865 553339
>
>.... WindowError:009 Horrible bug encountered. God knows what happened.
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------