Klarinet Archive - Posting 000745.txt from 2002/04

From: Daniel Leeson <leeson0@-----.net>
Subj: Re: [kl] Tony Pay, Articulation and K. 622
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2002 13:55:13 -0400

"Out of" whatever sources the editor used to construct his edition.
Since there has not yet been issued a "critical commentary" to this
volume, I don't know what those sources were. But a contrast of the NMA
with a bunch of sources I know very well show clearly that the editor
took out a lot of articulations.

After all, Tony, the guy had to use something to create his edition.
For sure he did not take it entirely out of his head. Most of the
editors of the NMA volumes began with an existing edition and a bottle
of snow-pake. And, let me assure you, I used up a gallon of that stuff,
taking out crap that had been hanging around for 2 centuries.

Dan

Tony Pay wrote:
>
> On Thu, 25 Apr 2002 10:10:24 -0700, leeson0@-----.net said:
>
> > The Barenreiter edition was more concerned with the establishment of
> > the low note passages, than it was in achieving an edition with
> > reliable dynamics, phrases, and ornaments. But at least it did take a
> > lot of the slur marks out...
>
> Took a lot of the slur marks out of *what*, Dan?
>
> > ...which, while a step in the right direction, is not the be-all
> > end-all of editing, but with respect to K. 622, what is?
>
> Tony
> --
> _________ Tony Pay
> |ony:-) 79 Southmoor Rd Tony@-----.uk
> | |ay Oxford OX2 6RE http://classicalplus.gmn.com/artists
> tel/fax 01865 553339
>
> ... I appreciate your not breathing while I smoke.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------

--
***************************
** Dan Leeson **
** leeson0@-----.net **
***************************

---------------------------------------------------------------------