Klarinet Archive - Posting 000567.txt from 2002/03

From: Bill Hausmann <bhausmann1@-----.net>
Subj: Re: [kl] R-13 and intonation. . .good grief
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 18:25:01 -0500

At 09:01 AM 3/20/2002 -0500, David Hattner wrote:

>In a message dated 3/20/02 4:16:30 AM, Bill Hausmann writes:
>
><< The R-13 was revolutionary in the 1950's, but, given the advances by
>some other manufacturers, may be getting somewhat dated now. For example,
>better intonation can be found in any number of clarinets from other
>manufacturers, and even from other Buffet models. >>
>
>
>...As I said before to those who feel duty-bound to say negative things about
>Buffet clarinets: "Get over it."

I did not denigrate Buffet clarinets. In fact, If I had the money to burn,
I would be interested in adding one to my collection. All I am suggesting
is that the R-13's reputation may somewhat exceed its actual capability.
This is not because of a lack of capability but due to overinflation of its
reputation. As I said, Buffet makes other models. Some of these even
incorporate corrections to certain known deficiencies inherent in the
R-13's design. Does Buffet make the "best" clarinets in the world? I
don't know. Maybe. Are they AMONG the top manufacturers of clarinets in
the world? Certainly. Is the R-13 the only clarinet a professional or
serious student should consider? Absolutely not. There really ARE other
choices out there. Get over it.

Just for the record, the store I work for DOES carry the R-13, in addition
to Selmer, Yamaha, and Leblanc products. And I work on salary, not commission.

Bill Hausmann bhausmann1@-----.net
451 Old Orchard Drive
Essexville, MI 48732 ICQ UIN 4862265

If you have to mic a saxophone, the rest of the band is TOO LOUD!

---------------------------------------------------------------------
It's Sneezy.Org Pledge time. Please visit
http://www.sneezy.org/Pledge.html

   
     Copyright © Woodwind.Org, Inc. All Rights Reserved    Privacy Policy    Contact charette@woodwind.org